I found this, tell me this is not funny...
#1
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I found this, tell me this is not funny...
Found it on a messageboard somewhere...i guess my point is the V8 muscle mentality versus our 4cyl high rev beasts. Granted it's a civic or whatever in the pic but hell i've seen those with 400+whp. anyway,...just a laugh.
;-)
;-)
Trending Topics
#13
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Cherry Hill, N.J.
Posts: 896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's funny how they compare HP per liter to HP per pound. It's better to have a better HP per liter ratio. Which would you rahter have, a 2 liter with 500hp or an 8 liter with 400hp? Those muscle guys shouldn't even be talking about HP per pound as civics weigh much less. I never thought I would be taking sides with Honda, but anything can happen I guess. At least they admit they have no traction and the Civic has better fuel economy. Why are they bragging about 40ft burnout? That just shows no useable power is getting to the ground. Then again I am sure Civics can do long burnouts and achieve better 60ft.
#15
The other day, in the Sacramento area, I saw a Mustang with a license frame that said "BUILT WITH TOOLS, NOT CHOPSTICKS". What up wit dat? I like all enthusiast type cars.
Don't be hatin'
Don't be hatin'