Can I return the car to the dealer? used car less than a week...
#33
Evolving Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by initialDRacer
how about the 2k down that I paid to them via credit card? will I get that back?
#34
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by favre95
You think its bad that a dealer made a couple G's off of you? Wait till you buy a house! Then you'll realize what the dealer made off of you is a drop in the bucket. On a 30 year loan, you'll most likely pay double the value of a house if you were to pay the loan off. So...don't beat yourself up over it, welcome to America!
#35
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Springfield, VA
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by nsnguyen
I'm curious, what did you buy for your mom anyway?
#36
Evolving Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: where the 2005 World Series Champions play
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by nsnguyen
The other thing is that mortgage interest is tax deductible so you get a lot of that interest back when you file your taxes. If you change your mortgage to 15 years, then you pay a lot less than 2x the value of the house if you end up paying it back.
you also will be paying very close to 2x the value of your house on a 15 year loan. a rough calculation: buy a house for $100,000 @ a generous 7% will mean you pay around $170,000. i low balled my calculation of interest as well. i could give you the exact number, but i don't have a good calculator or a future value of money table on hand.
#37
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My tax rate is closer to 33%. I agree that interest does cost you in the long run, but with real estate at least you have the chance of selling for more than what you ended up paying. You assume the cost of maintaining a property and the risk that your property will depreciate but so far it works out to be better than renting for most people. There's zero opportunity for that with cars, unless you're extraordinarily lucky.
Anyway, in many areas inflation and home values have kept ahead of mortgage rates so a $50,000 home purchased 30 years ago is worth around $300,000 today in suburban chicago. Meanwhile, the bank has pocketed (assuming no refinancing or home equity loans) around $120,000 with that 30 year mortgage. It's not such a bad deal if real estate trends continue, and who knows if they will, particularly in california. In Los Angeles, homes that cost 50,000 in the 1970's are sitting on land worth over $1M today, so people can and do win big in real estate. This is clearly not the norm but I'm just throwing it out there.
Here's an example: http://minneapolisfed.org/Research/d...calc/index.cfm Using the consumer price index as a guide, and ignoring any local market forces, a $100,000 house 30 years ago in 1975 is worth approximately $362,000 today. Which is far better than the total of a 30 year mortgage on that property.
7% is reasonable for borrowing that much money, and if it's the choice between not being able to afford a home and having that ability, then it's good to have that choice. The reason why you pay so much interest is because of the length of the term, and most mortgages don't stop you from paying an aggressive schedule or even paying off the whole mortgage in a year (if you win the lottery). I mean, it's a capitalist society. We earn money and we spend it. People with goods and services to offer will offer it at what people are willing to pay for it. I assume you're a homeowner so the pros have to outweigh the cons (particularly in suburban Chicago), right?
I've bought and sold a home and in the end it won out bigtime over renting. That's enough for me.
Anyway, in many areas inflation and home values have kept ahead of mortgage rates so a $50,000 home purchased 30 years ago is worth around $300,000 today in suburban chicago. Meanwhile, the bank has pocketed (assuming no refinancing or home equity loans) around $120,000 with that 30 year mortgage. It's not such a bad deal if real estate trends continue, and who knows if they will, particularly in california. In Los Angeles, homes that cost 50,000 in the 1970's are sitting on land worth over $1M today, so people can and do win big in real estate. This is clearly not the norm but I'm just throwing it out there.
Here's an example: http://minneapolisfed.org/Research/d...calc/index.cfm Using the consumer price index as a guide, and ignoring any local market forces, a $100,000 house 30 years ago in 1975 is worth approximately $362,000 today. Which is far better than the total of a 30 year mortgage on that property.
7% is reasonable for borrowing that much money, and if it's the choice between not being able to afford a home and having that ability, then it's good to have that choice. The reason why you pay so much interest is because of the length of the term, and most mortgages don't stop you from paying an aggressive schedule or even paying off the whole mortgage in a year (if you win the lottery). I mean, it's a capitalist society. We earn money and we spend it. People with goods and services to offer will offer it at what people are willing to pay for it. I assume you're a homeowner so the pros have to outweigh the cons (particularly in suburban Chicago), right?
I've bought and sold a home and in the end it won out bigtime over renting. That's enough for me.
Last edited by osunick; Jun 24, 2005 at 12:01 PM.
#38
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Springfield, VA
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have good news, I saved a bunch of money on my bank account by returning the car I had a big discussion but I kept saying NO because they are trying to get rid of that car for sure. They called me atleast 10 times this weekend. They lowered the price to 8000 and I think that's pretty good but I rather just spend it on a new car with better warranty. Thanks everyone for your moral support.
#39
I understand how home loans work. I am just saying, when you sign your papers don't look at what your going to pay the bank if you were to take the full term of the loan. Cause on a 30 year loan which is really common place today. Expect to pay double what the price was. AND NOT all homes appreciate at the pace of what you would pay....just depends where and what you buy.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post