EVO to Cayman?........
#92
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Irvine,CA
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't know, but personally from your pics.. the cayman looks really effeminate.
It lacks the sharp rough edges of a man's car... and the interior color doesn't help either.
I'm sure it makes a great mom's car though.
It lacks the sharp rough edges of a man's car... and the interior color doesn't help either.
I'm sure it makes a great mom's car though.
#94
That Cayman looks great. The Z4 ihmo fell out of the ugly tree and I drive an e46 3-series. Anyone who doesn't at least respect the Cayman for what it is capable of loses car enthusiast credibility in my book.
#95
As has been proven, you can build an RV that can beat a Ferrari, but who really cares about straight line speed? Both the Evo and the Porsche are excellent handling cars - and I personally think, from comparing them side-by-side, a stock Boxster would outhandle a stock Evo on a tarmac track (a dirt or wet road is a different matter, of course!). I really don't like the whole drag racing straight line thing - it doesn't really prove anything, and it doesn't really involve much driver skill. It's great to test an drivetrain is performing as expected, but it's not the best way to drive a car or challenge a driver. Nowhere else in the world do people seriously test 1/4 mile times.
At the end of the day I got the Evo for it's practicality (4-door sedan), and rally heritage (so I can have some fun). Taking practicality aside, if I *had* to choose, I'd take the Porsche - even though the Evo is quicker. Driving a car which just feels right (with all that Porsche racing heritage) is a totally different experience.
Oh, and the Z4 is also a nice handling car (far better than the Z3 - which sucked, and was BMW's self-confessed mistake). I've had the opportunity to drive one of those hard, and it felt very good. Overally, though, I still preferred the Porsche from a driving point of view. As for the looks, that's a totally personal thing (and cannot be decided here - everyone has their own view and it would be a boring world if everyone liked the same thing!), and I personally like both the Porsche lines and the Z4 lines, although they are very different.
Thanks!
S.
Last edited by Rom; Jan 9, 2007 at 03:14 PM.
#96
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Mussolini's back yard
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anyway, I'm also gonna look at the new BMW M z4 coupe. Now that car seems quite impressive at least on paper. The straight six engine has 6 throttles and can propel the car to 4.9 seconds 0-60..... Now that's power that compares well with the EVO. Also, the price is the same as the base Cayman. I don't know about the new Z4, but the new 325 series BMW is a sweet machine. If that Coupe is more comfy than the Cayman, I'll get one for sure!! (if the money is right, of course)
#97
Gee fellows, I did not start this thread for a competition between the Cayman and the Z4M. Both cars are quite nice and excellent performers in their own way. Each has it's strengths and weaknesses. I was talking about buying a Porsche (and in another thread a Z4M) to replace my EVO.... So far I've put the brakes on either car and I'm seriously considering the 335i. BTW, to all the German car bashers, all I can say is to actually test drive them before passing judgement on these cars. Wake up and smell the coffee friends. Those German cars are very competitive with the EVO and quite superior in some respects. The 335i is definitely a serious contender even for the straight line or dyno wars guys. The one I test drove felt quicker and faste than my EVO.....
#98
Evolving Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LOL! In a straight line your truck could maybe keep up with my BoxSter (not sure what truck you have?)... The only problem is - on the first corner your truck will fall over. Comparing a truck to a Porsche is just not... right. And sure, an M3 could "take" a Boxster in a straight line, but around corners it would be a much closer fight. The M3 happens to be a pretty good handling car, often used as the RWD car of choice, but the Boxster is far more dynamic and balanced. Have you driven a Porsche or an M3? Have you ever driven on a track?
Thanks!
S.
Thanks!
S.
i havnt driven either car because #1 i dont fit in a boxter and #2 a BMW dealership is gonna look at me and laugh, im 19 and they know i just wanna drive the hell out of the car.
#99
i drive an 07 tacoma x-runner. the best handling truck on the road. yeah everyone thinks that a truck and handling doesnt go together, but i think .90g's is pretty damn good, and no, your Boxter wont run away in the twisties, its more of, who has bigger cajones...
i havnt driven either car because #1 i dont fit in a boxter and #2 a BMW dealership is gonna look at me and laugh, im 19 and they know i just wanna drive the hell out of the car.
i havnt driven either car because #1 i dont fit in a boxter and #2 a BMW dealership is gonna look at me and laugh, im 19 and they know i just wanna drive the hell out of the car.
#100
Evolving Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Palo Alto
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The slalom will give you a better idea of how the truck can handle than the skid pad.
The x-runner does have an impressive slalom for a truck, but the Boxster is well known as being one the best handling Porsches. The Boxster S has recorded better slalom times than the Enzo.
Porsches truly are in a league of their own. Everytime I get behind my dad's 996 C4S I realize how the other sports cars I've owned just don't measure up.
The x-runner does have an impressive slalom for a truck, but the Boxster is well known as being one the best handling Porsches. The Boxster S has recorded better slalom times than the Enzo.
Porsches truly are in a league of their own. Everytime I get behind my dad's 996 C4S I realize how the other sports cars I've owned just don't measure up.
#101
The slalom will give you a better idea of how the truck can handle than the skid pad.
The x-runner does have an impressive slalom for a truck, but the Boxster is well known as being one the best handling Porsches. The Boxster S has recorded better slalom times than the Enzo.
Porsches truly are in a league of their own. Everytime I get behind my dad's 996 C4S I realize how the other sports cars I've owned just don't measure up.
The x-runner does have an impressive slalom for a truck, but the Boxster is well known as being one the best handling Porsches. The Boxster S has recorded better slalom times than the Enzo.
Porsches truly are in a league of their own. Everytime I get behind my dad's 996 C4S I realize how the other sports cars I've owned just don't measure up.
#102
Evolving Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Palo Alto
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I completely agree, and I don't want to sound like a snob because I really don't mean to be one, but until you get behind the wheel of a Porsche, it's hard to understand what it's about if you're just taking magazine numbers. So, while a truck might put up similar times or numbers and might be able to keep up around a road course the driving experience will be day and night. I've driven AMG SUVs and while they're fast, they still feel clunky and don't inspire the same confidence a true sports car does.
I love my Evo, don't get me wrong. I prefer it to an M3 or a 335 because I don't believe the mark up is worth it (the M Coupe is a whole other story), but the Evo simply does not compare to the 996 and the 996 isn't too much faster.
I love my Evo, don't get me wrong. I prefer it to an M3 or a 335 because I don't believe the mark up is worth it (the M Coupe is a whole other story), but the Evo simply does not compare to the 996 and the 996 isn't too much faster.
#103
Just like we're laughing at you now on how you *think* your X-runner can keep up with the boxter on the track, autox. Don't get me wrong, it is a nice car and you should be proud of it w/o a doubt, but w/o driven both of the cars OR any track experiences - you don't really have much creditability on the subject.
#104
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: So.Cal 626.909.562
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
stock evo compared to some of the vehicles mentioned obviously is no real match. but a modded EVO to make up for the price gap could take most of the cars mentioned.
boxter is like an s2k, handles somewhat well, but underpowered. i've driven a boxter and also raced it, it's cool, but definitely not worth the price. not bang for the buck.
to the thread starter, the caymann is a nice car, but i think if you mod your evo a bit you will be just as happy. ~350hp, suspension, it's just as good or better for much less. imo, unless you're "BALLIN'" haha and want to step up to a GT2, 3, 911TT, just mod a evo. it's bang for the buck.
boxter is like an s2k, handles somewhat well, but underpowered. i've driven a boxter and also raced it, it's cool, but definitely not worth the price. not bang for the buck.
to the thread starter, the caymann is a nice car, but i think if you mod your evo a bit you will be just as happy. ~350hp, suspension, it's just as good or better for much less. imo, unless you're "BALLIN'" haha and want to step up to a GT2, 3, 911TT, just mod a evo. it's bang for the buck.