Evo X vs. Evo VIII and IX
Jan 9, 2007, 12:09 PM
#48
Having kept-up with the X info, I can honestly say there's nothing I like about it. I find its styling to be generally unappealing, as well as its interior, and the new powertrain does little to inspire a great deal of interest. I loathe the concept behind an automatic gearbox and the aluminum block would always remind me of a Vega. I could also give a flying f#ck about cruise control, navigation and the hideous steering wheel buttons. Basically, had the X been available instead of the IX, I would have never purchased it. It seems like Mitsubishi wants to turn the Evo into a GT and that's not what I want.
Jan 9, 2007, 12:18 PM
#51
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Norwalk, CT
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
after having driven a DSG for awhile (gf's Jetta), I'm almost 100% positive that a switch to a clutchless system is in the works for me in the future. . .so it's a question of cost and working out the bugs. . .
I'm about 80% sure I'd trade the VIII in for a X, which is why my VIII hasn't been modded, but I need to test drive the X and see if I like it. . .it seems more refined and less raw than the current VIII/IX, which will work well my aging old fart a$$!
I'm about 80% sure I'd trade the VIII in for a X, which is why my VIII hasn't been modded, but I need to test drive the X and see if I like it. . .it seems more refined and less raw than the current VIII/IX, which will work well my aging old fart a$$!
Jan 9, 2007, 12:32 PM
#54
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Probably not. Not cause I don't like the X or the oh so awesome - seriously, I wish I had it - S-AWC, but because the 4G63 Engine in the VIII's and IX's are solid. While they're not the newest tech, they've had ample time to work out any - hopefully all - kinks in it's design. The block in the new X will no doubt blow away all kinds of competition, but personally, I'd wait for the XII to make sure I'm getting a solid car. Plus, who knows, maybe by then they'll be beasty hybrids... that can fly ;-p
Jan 9, 2007, 01:50 PM
#56
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont like the way it looks, but that might grow on me.
I would not be in a hurry to buy the first two model years, we dont have to look far in the VIII through IX years in the USA to see just how quick Mitsu are to improve things for the better.
I would sit back, see how the tuners do with it then make a decision.
My gut feeling is the IX's will be keepers once everyone is let down by the X (heavier, curvier and a general design direction away from what made the Evo great to begin with).
Edit:
The X will be great for those a little afraid of the rawness of the previous Evo's which Im sure will increase sales, especially if the DSG is in fact offered. Smart move by Mitsu, can't blame them for it.
I would not be in a hurry to buy the first two model years, we dont have to look far in the VIII through IX years in the USA to see just how quick Mitsu are to improve things for the better.
I would sit back, see how the tuners do with it then make a decision.
My gut feeling is the IX's will be keepers once everyone is let down by the X (heavier, curvier and a general design direction away from what made the Evo great to begin with).
Edit:
The X will be great for those a little afraid of the rawness of the previous Evo's which Im sure will increase sales, especially if the DSG is in fact offered. Smart move by Mitsu, can't blame them for it.
Last edited by res04; Jan 9, 2007 at 01:55 PM.
Jan 9, 2007, 01:57 PM
#57
Probably not. Not cause I don't like the X or the oh so awesome - seriously, I wish I had it - S-AWC, but because the 4G63 Engine in the VIII's and IX's are solid. While they're not the newest tech, they've had ample time to work out any - hopefully all - kinks in it's design. The block in the new X will no doubt blow away all kinds of competition, but personally, I'd wait for the XII to make sure I'm getting a solid car. Plus, who knows, maybe by then they'll be beasty hybrids... that can fly ;-p
-More weight (200lbs heavier)
-Crappy low power aluminum 2.0 Liter (not as "boostable")
-Taller Center of gravity
Hmmmm...not looking so good. The Evolution has finally stopped. You might as well just go out and buy a AWD Acura TL (heavy and slow). Thank you Daimler Chrysler for ruinning a perfectly good Japanese street machine! Bastards!
Last edited by sonicnofadz; Jan 9, 2007 at 02:03 PM.
Jan 9, 2007, 02:01 PM
#58
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: 23rd Quadrant of the Gamma Sector
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hell, a commet may hit anytime and kill everything on this earth. Might as well keep the IX and buy a X. If your going to be a Bear, be a GRIZZLY!!!
Jan 9, 2007, 04:57 PM
#60
Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northwestern, PA
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Having kept-up with the X info, I can honestly say there's nothing I like about it. I find its styling to be generally unappealing, as well as its interior, and the new powertrain does little to inspire a great deal of interest. I loathe the concept behind an automatic gearbox and the aluminum block would always remind me of a Vega. I could also give a flying f#ck about cruise control, navigation and the hideous steering wheel buttons. Basically, had the X been available instead of the IX, I would have never purchased it. It seems like Mitsubishi wants to turn the Evo into a GT and that's not what I want.
QFT
One of the reasons I bought my IX when I did was because I had a feeling Mitsubishi (and Subaru too, to be truthful) were going to be going in this direction with their rally-based cars.
Now that we've seen what Mitsubishi has brought to the table, we'll have to wait until fall when the new STI debuts in Frankfurt to see if Subaru follows along the same path.