Shedding the weight... CF trunk & hood
#78
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Chantilly,VA
Posts: 920
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
didn't feel a thing. Actaully handling should improve because of removing the end weights. just 4 bolts are hold each bars. and you will see the rust where it contacts the body. I would remove it for that reason only
#79
Evolving Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by taenaive
didn't feel a thing. Actaully handling should improve because of removing the end weights. just 4 bolts are hold each bars. and you will see the rust where it contacts the body. I would remove it for that reason only
#80
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: CO/WI
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For the trunk, did you take the lock out of your stock trunk so that your ignition key would still open the CF trunk? If so, how hard was it to remove the lock?
What wave is the CF? 1x1? 2x2? Same as spoiler?
What wave is the CF? 1x1? 2x2? Same as spoiler?
#81
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Originally Posted by john@rre
Removing the crash beams is the stupidest place to ever attempt to lighten an Evo. If you run your car into anything, you are risking major damage to mission critical expensive components at even slow(5-10mph) impact speeds, and God help you if you get run into or hit anything significant. We have never removed the bumper beams from any of our street, track day or competition cars because the risk is not worth it in my opinion.
#82
Evolving Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by voidhawk
If the crash beam is that critical, why do Evo's in any country but the US get sold without them? It seems to me they are mainly meant to achieve compliance with US bumper regulations (something like car may not be damaged in impacts below 5 mph). I agree you take the risk of more expensive damage from a fender bender, but I don't think it is a safety concern.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...hlight=Mueller
#84
Evolving Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by voidhawk
Doesn't look like the crash bar made much of a difference
#87
Evolving Member
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: [North] Dallas, TX
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh...you mean like this? High speed, no front crash beam.
http://ntexasevos.org/img/tmp/tmp.htm
http://ntexasevos.org/img/tmp/tmp.htm
Originally Posted by john@rre
<snip>...The worst for you nuts without bumper beams would be an impact into a solid object on the end of the driver's side frame rail, as the crash energy will be transfered immediately to where you are sitting.
#89
Evolving Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ez