Interested in hearing input from you TTA guys...
#106
Evolved Member
iTrader: (35)
you don't take points for any weight reduction. Everybody uses the alternate weight method. Car can be down to 3263 (depends on model), with driver and fuel. Once you start gutting, it's easy to get down in the 3000 or below range, but then add a cage, and driver, and fuel, and the car's fat again.
Other than the cooler, what more do you have? You can freely bump your HP in TTS, (any mods you'd like, i'd check on turbo swap, but TTS/U/R are just hp/weight based classes.)
remember, i'm running TTA. and i'm clipping around sebring with the new car, suspension honestly unsetup, with stock power/boost (untuned turboback), ra-1's @ 2.30. I'd honestly bet the car has a 27 or 28 in the current form with no hp upgrades, and i can get 370ish hp, and stay in class.
Other than the cooler, what more do you have? You can freely bump your HP in TTS, (any mods you'd like, i'd check on turbo swap, but TTS/U/R are just hp/weight based classes.)
remember, i'm running TTA. and i'm clipping around sebring with the new car, suspension honestly unsetup, with stock power/boost (untuned turboback), ra-1's @ 2.30. I'd honestly bet the car has a 27 or 28 in the current form with no hp upgrades, and i can get 370ish hp, and stay in class.
#107
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
you don't take points for any weight reduction. Everybody uses the alternate weight method. Car can be down to 3263 (depends on model), with driver and fuel. Once you start gutting, it's easy to get down in the 3000 or below range, but then add a cage, and driver, and fuel, and the car's fat again.
Other than the cooler, what more do you have? You can freely bump your HP in TTS, (any mods you'd like, i'd check on turbo swap, but TTS/U/R are just hp/weight based classes.)
remember, i'm running TTA. and i'm clipping around sebring with the new car, suspension honestly unsetup, with stock power/boost (untuned turboback), ra-1's @ 2.30. I'd honestly bet the car has a 27 or 28 in the current form with no hp upgrades, and i can get 370ish hp, and stay in class.
Other than the cooler, what more do you have? You can freely bump your HP in TTS, (any mods you'd like, i'd check on turbo swap, but TTS/U/R are just hp/weight based classes.)
remember, i'm running TTA. and i'm clipping around sebring with the new car, suspension honestly unsetup, with stock power/boost (untuned turboback), ra-1's @ 2.30. I'd honestly bet the car has a 27 or 28 in the current form with no hp upgrades, and i can get 370ish hp, and stay in class.
NT01's +4 (R1's +6)
Removal of trunk lining +1
ECU flash +10
mod of air box +1
boost controller +4
cooler +4
fuel pump +2
tbe +2 no cat +1
Shocks with external res (even though they arn't like motons still counts) +10
springs +2
rear sway +2
roll center kit +2
rear strut bar +1
modified sub-frame bars +3
fab (beatrush) flat bottom/belly tray +5 (i tried to neg. this one but no gimme even though i'm only using half of the kit)
=54
I can get rid of the rear strut and the sub frame but that's still not enough. The car torque's out of the turns so well and sticks it's hard to go back to stockish setup.
So at this point its build HP and shave weight (on myself too lol) ?
Last edited by Balrok; Sep 13, 2007 at 10:57 AM.
#108
Evolved Member
iTrader: (35)
again, you don't take points for weight reduction. you do NOT take points for weight reduction.
Use the alternate weight method. Set the alternate weight at 3263, and you take no points.
The kw's both of us have are +7. They have a "piggyback" external reservoir.
Sub frame bars? Under tray? Pull the cooler, and both of those, and you're in TTA. it's not hard at all. Or leave the cooler and run stock boost.
Use the alternate weight method. Set the alternate weight at 3263, and you take no points.
The kw's both of us have are +7. They have a "piggyback" external reservoir.
Sub frame bars? Under tray? Pull the cooler, and both of those, and you're in TTA. it's not hard at all. Or leave the cooler and run stock boost.
#109
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
LoL, alrighty then. Well can't pull the undertray as.....i don't have the stock one any longer..it got ripped apart by a combonation of modification to fit the original cooler, then chunk of sod got stuck in it - bending it down, then small rodent did the rest. And research has shown that having none at all is a bad thing I think it came off in 5 pieces . You just want to wax me in tta . Why don't you up your boost and run TTS? That way both of us can chase down the vette
#110
Evolved Member
iTrader: (35)
LoL, alrighty then. Well can't pull the undertray as.....i don't have the stock one any longer..it got ripped apart by a combonation of modification to fit the original cooler, then chunk of sod got stuck in it - bending it down, then small rodent did the rest. And research has shown that having none at all is a bad thing I think it came off in 5 pieces . You just want to wax me in tta . Why don't you up your boost and run TTS? That way both of us can chase down the vette
#111
Evolved Member
iTrader: (47)
LoL, alrighty then. Well can't pull the undertray as.....i don't have the stock one any longer..it got ripped apart by a combonation of modification to fit the original cooler, then chunk of sod got stuck in it - bending it down, then small rodent did the rest. And research has shown that having none at all is a bad thing I think it came off in 5 pieces . You just want to wax me in tta . Why don't you up your boost and run TTS? That way both of us can chase down the vette
"The biggest source of improvement was the increase in straight-line speed, which was 15 mph faster than without the panel."
#114
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well I ripped my undertray off this past weekend at Nationals after exiting the track at 130+ mph with no brakes. The subsequent sessions revealed a DEFINATE loss of high speed stability (120+ mph). You can feel the air packing up under the car, and transitions at that speed were a little un-nerving.
The only Evo that will win TTA in the OH/IN or Midwest regions (or Nationals for that matter) will be one FULLY developed and probably illegal for the class, costing way more than I would ever spend on a race car. The TTA Z06 that just won at Nationals winning time would have placed 3rd in TTS, 3rd in TTU, and 4th in TTR. TTR was an all Evo podium, but they were only 2 seconds faster than the TTA winner.....
The only Evo that will win TTA in the OH/IN or Midwest regions (or Nationals for that matter) will be one FULLY developed and probably illegal for the class, costing way more than I would ever spend on a race car. The TTA Z06 that just won at Nationals winning time would have placed 3rd in TTS, 3rd in TTU, and 4th in TTR. TTR was an all Evo podium, but they were only 2 seconds faster than the TTA winner.....
#115
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
The only Evo that will win TTA in the OH/IN or Midwest regions (or Nationals for that matter) will be one FULLY developed and probably illegal for the class, costing way more than I would ever spend on a race car. The TTA Z06 that just won at Nationals winning time would have placed 3rd in TTS, 3rd in TTU, and 4th in TTR. TTR was an all Evo podium, but they were only 2 seconds faster than the TTA winner.....
So what was the setup/story with your brakes?
#116
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not really a money game with the Vettes, the top 4 TTA cars this weekend (all Z06's) are basically stock. Big Hoosiers, sway bars, intake. That's it. Anything is possible, but someone would really have to put a single-minded program together with an amazing driver to take the class.
As for the brakes, I had a left rear line failure at the fastest place on the track. Check your lines often fellas.
As for the brakes, I had a left rear line failure at the fastest place on the track. Check your lines often fellas.
#117
Evolved Member
iTrader: (35)
Well I ripped my undertray off this past weekend at Nationals after exiting the track at 130+ mph with no brakes. The subsequent sessions revealed a DEFINATE loss of high speed stability (120+ mph). You can feel the air packing up under the car, and transitions at that speed were a little un-nerving.
The only Evo that will win TTA in the OH/IN or Midwest regions (or Nationals for that matter) will be one FULLY developed and probably illegal for the class, costing way more than I would ever spend on a race car. The TTA Z06 that just won at Nationals winning time would have placed 3rd in TTS, 3rd in TTU, and 4th in TTR. TTR was an all Evo podium, but they were only 2 seconds faster than the TTA winner.....
The only Evo that will win TTA in the OH/IN or Midwest regions (or Nationals for that matter) will be one FULLY developed and probably illegal for the class, costing way more than I would ever spend on a race car. The TTA Z06 that just won at Nationals winning time would have placed 3rd in TTS, 3rd in TTU, and 4th in TTR. TTR was an all Evo podium, but they were only 2 seconds faster than the TTA winner.....
Tray or no tray, I couldn't tell the difference. (without the tray is a touch lighter ). Turns 17 and 1 are mid-high speed corners that are worse than county roads up there. (80-100 mph, full suspension travel required.) Never had any hints of the nose floating around on me.
As far as for the speed, I've only ran up there once, with a brand new suspension, 1 day old full tread ra-1's, and :ahem: lots of rear toe. (don't ask).
the first day, the car was miserably off. 1200 miles and a set of loose rear toe bolts had its way with the rear end. (1:48's? wtf) But by the afternoon on the second day, i was loosing a second each session (down to a 42.)
Now, while thats not at all impressive.... I went over and ran g-man. Had never run anything but a stock evo there twice, so on a drizzling rainy track, a 33 was all I could do.
I came back and ran sebring, and was no faster than i was with a stock evo. (2:36) Something's not right. Ive run out there 15-20 times. Check some more stuff, go back out 2 weeks later, solid 2.30s.
That being said, i think a properly setup evo, with the 370ish hp, and a good driver can match the mid-30's times.
Also, We ran the 2.4 mi setup, and well, My car is fat (as am I) and stock hp/boosted.
Again, at this point, its all bench racing, and the rules will change again, but congrats to the people that actually made it all the way up there and got it done.
#119
Evolved Member
iTrader: (35)
It'd be interesting to see if any of the cars were legal.
#120
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They dyno'd and weighed all of them, they were all legal. Perhaps I am mistaken on the intake, although at least two of them were running 285's which gives them some points back.
As for the TTA/Evo thing, let me just say this. MY car won't make 370 legally and leave me points for big enough tires to use the power. Every car in the class was on at least 275's, and I think you need every bit of that. It's a shame that Robi's car broke on wednesday, I was looking forward to comparing times with Russ.
As for the TTA/Evo thing, let me just say this. MY car won't make 370 legally and leave me points for big enough tires to use the power. Every car in the class was on at least 275's, and I think you need every bit of that. It's a shame that Robi's car broke on wednesday, I was looking forward to comparing times with Russ.