2009 BSP Discussion
#151
#152
My 3 gallon assumption is based on this:
For NT's and such where I run race gas I will plan (fuel strategy baby!) to run the car about 35-40 miles past where the light comes on before adding race gas. Based on the uber wonderful mileage my car seems to get this would indicate I have more than 2 gallons left. otherwise my car lives on pump gas.
Of course there is most likely some variation between sensors and linkages within the tanks and could be some production variance between the early 03's and your 06.
For NT's and such where I run race gas I will plan (fuel strategy baby!) to run the car about 35-40 miles past where the light comes on before adding race gas. Based on the uber wonderful mileage my car seems to get this would indicate I have more than 2 gallons left. otherwise my car lives on pump gas.
Of course there is most likely some variation between sensors and linkages within the tanks and could be some production variance between the early 03's and your 06.
#153
At $15 per gallon I am very conscious of any waste of the magic gas I run! I have no problem just throwing 5 gallons in the car, but whatever I don't use by end of event will be no good by next event according to VP's website. The Q16 is not like regular gas, obviously....
#154
At $15 per gallon I am very conscious of any waste of the magic gas I run! I have no problem just throwing 5 gallons in the car, but whatever I don't use by end of event will be no good by next event according to VP's website. The Q16 is not like regular gas, obviously....
#155
Awesome, I will be using that calculation for this weekend. In fact this will be a good test to see if this solves the funky AFR sputtering problem on my last runs. Since I will not have the oil cooler fan in time for this weekend it will be apples to apples from last few events where I had the issue.
#156
IMHO, on a stock turbo there is no need. You could get as much power out of MS109 . . . or E85. . .
The stock turbo is maxxed out before you reach the knock ceiling of MS109 or E85. I would put up $$ that you can make MORE power on E85 on a stock turbo than you can on Q16. . . due to the huge oxygen content of the E85. More oxygen in the cylinder = more power. . .
If you are worried about reliability of the E85 and don't plan on driving daily on it - look here:
http://www.rockettbrand.com/productspecs/specs.html
The "112" is their E85. About 1/2 the price of Q16. . .
EVOlutionary
The stock turbo is maxxed out before you reach the knock ceiling of MS109 or E85. I would put up $$ that you can make MORE power on E85 on a stock turbo than you can on Q16. . . due to the huge oxygen content of the E85. More oxygen in the cylinder = more power. . .
If you are worried about reliability of the E85 and don't plan on driving daily on it - look here:
http://www.rockettbrand.com/productspecs/specs.html
The "112" is their E85. About 1/2 the price of Q16. . .
EVOlutionary
#157
I ran between 5 and 6 gallons of fuel today at the Autox, that totally cured my issue of car breaking up/missing when it was hot. Even stranger was my oil temps were in check today, got to 240 but would come down pretty quick after spraying downing oil cooler. I basically just let the car idle and was hosing the oil cooler for like a minute straight. That kind of did the trick. I have an oil cooler fan en route now that I will be hooking up to cure the oil temp issue (not that 240 is really an issue).
Another note Jon Kekek Winchester came down to our Holbert Autox today. He beat me by a tenth, it was a battle. After reflecting on the day I am a little disappointed because I am on race fuel and he was on 93 pump. Oh his tires were a little tired too, so I need to step up next time I see him! Here that Jon, I am stepping it up..
Another note Jon Kekek Winchester came down to our Holbert Autox today. He beat me by a tenth, it was a battle. After reflecting on the day I am a little disappointed because I am on race fuel and he was on 93 pump. Oh his tires were a little tired too, so I need to step up next time I see him! Here that Jon, I am stepping it up..
#158
IMHO, on a stock turbo there is no need. You could get as much power out of MS109 . . . or E85. . .
The stock turbo is maxxed out before you reach the knock ceiling of MS109 or E85. I would put up $$ that you can make MORE power on E85 on a stock turbo than you can on Q16. . . due to the huge oxygen content of the E85. More oxygen in the cylinder = more power. . .
If you are worried about reliability of the E85 and don't plan on driving daily on it - look here:
http://www.rockettbrand.com/productspecs/specs.html
The "112" is their E85. About 1/2 the price of Q16. . .
EVOlutionary
The stock turbo is maxxed out before you reach the knock ceiling of MS109 or E85. I would put up $$ that you can make MORE power on E85 on a stock turbo than you can on Q16. . . due to the huge oxygen content of the E85. More oxygen in the cylinder = more power. . .
If you are worried about reliability of the E85 and don't plan on driving daily on it - look here:
http://www.rockettbrand.com/productspecs/specs.html
The "112" is their E85. About 1/2 the price of Q16. . .
EVOlutionary
#160
Quick question. You know the access panel for the front jacking point on the evo.
Is it considered legal for SP to run WITHOUT that panel on?
I've kind of changed how I do things on the car and prefer jacking either end instead of on the side. The way I see it removal is an alternate configuration which is allowed, since it is necessary to gain access. Kind of like trunk liner/spare/jack removal.
Anyone see it differently?
John
Is it considered legal for SP to run WITHOUT that panel on?
I've kind of changed how I do things on the car and prefer jacking either end instead of on the side. The way I see it removal is an alternate configuration which is allowed, since it is necessary to gain access. Kind of like trunk liner/spare/jack removal.
Anyone see it differently?
John
#161
Quick question. You know the access panel for the front jacking point on the evo.
Is it considered legal for SP to run WITHOUT that panel on?
I've kind of changed how I do things on the car and prefer jacking either end instead of on the side. The way I see it removal is an alternate configuration which is allowed, since it is necessary to gain access. Kind of like trunk liner/spare/jack removal.
Anyone see it differently?
John
Is it considered legal for SP to run WITHOUT that panel on?
I've kind of changed how I do things on the car and prefer jacking either end instead of on the side. The way I see it removal is an alternate configuration which is allowed, since it is necessary to gain access. Kind of like trunk liner/spare/jack removal.
Anyone see it differently?
John
Illegal to remove it. although admittedly we don't run that panel for local events either. and it's always a pain in the *** to find the stupid push screw things to re-attach it for the national events.
#162
OK, well I've stripped out yet another eccentric on the rear suspension (it's not as bad as the other one -- yet). The alignment tech suggested that I might want to swap the arm/eccentric with an adjustable link.
First is that legal in BSP? It looks like 15. H.* talks about these as if they are legal.
Second are they even available for the Evo X? I can't remember actually seeing them anywhere.
Has anyone else gone to this setup?
First is that legal in BSP? It looks like 15. H.* talks about these as if they are legal.
Second are they even available for the Evo X? I can't remember actually seeing them anywhere.
Has anyone else gone to this setup?
#163
OK, well I've stripped out yet another eccentric on the rear suspension (it's not as bad as the other one -- yet). The alignment tech suggested that I might want to swap the arm/eccentric with an adjustable link.
First is that legal in BSP? It looks like 15. H.* talks about these as if they are legal.
Second are they even available for the Evo X? I can't remember actually seeing them anywhere.
Has anyone else gone to this setup?
First is that legal in BSP? It looks like 15. H.* talks about these as if they are legal.
Second are they even available for the Evo X? I can't remember actually seeing them anywhere.
Has anyone else gone to this setup?
Personally I HATE those things. I actually keep 2 spares of each bolt all the time (toe link, LCA and nuts).
#164
If you are talking about the toe control arm, yep, they are available for the X. I have not seen the rear suspension of an EVO X, but I assume you are talking about something like this?
http://www.green.dti.ne.jp/unlimited...d/rearrod.html
I will let others comment on legality.
http://www.green.dti.ne.jp/unlimited...d/rearrod.html
I will let others comment on legality.
#165
If anyone happens to be looking for a lightweight exhaust manifold, I have an ASpec Titanium exhaust manifold I'm going to sell. It will be in the 4-sale threads soon - but I thought I'd give you guys first dibs. It weighs 5.5# - about 10# less than the stock unit. That's 10# off the very front of the car which is nice. . . pm for details.
http://www.aspecproducts.com/images.asp?theid=16163
http://www.aspecproducts.com/images.asp?theid=16163