Notices
Motor Sports If you like rallying, road racing, autoxing, or track events, then this is the spot for you.

Official 2010 Formula One Discussion F1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 19, 2010 | 05:41 PM
  #556  
GG06MR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 5
From: SATown
Originally Posted by KPerez
Clearly the spark plug failure had nothing to do with RB aero package or the Renault engine while Ferrari has admited that Massa overheating was due to some aero piece/design which they are trying to rectify. In short, Ferrari has as much, if not more, of a problem as RB...Melbourne will tell the tale.

Later, Ken
My speculative comment was prior to finding out that it was a spark plug failure, but I don't expect to find out if Red Bull has gotten past their higher than average engine failure issue until their 2nd race on the same engine(s).....since I only recall one of the Renault engines tanking on them last year in it's 1st outing. I do think you're right that Ferrari may have a serious problem on their hands if they ended up essentially wasting 2 engines for each driver to gain a 1-2 finish in the 1st race of the season though. That would leave each of their 6 remaining engines 3 race events a piece, which is less than optimal.
Old Mar 20, 2010 | 12:13 AM
  #557  
Billy@EnglishRacing's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,458
Likes: 0
From: Puyallup, wa
Originally Posted by KPerez
Clearly the spark plug failure had nothing to do with RB aero package or the Renault engine while Ferrari has admited that Massa overheating was due to some aero piece/design which they are trying to rectify. In short, Ferrari has as much, if not more, of a problem as RB...Melbourne will tell the tale.

Later, Ken

One of Ferrari's major problems is how heavy they are at the start of the race. The are using a good bit more fuel then any of the other cars.

If the Red Bull's have Merc motors last year i think we might have witnessed a different race for the drivers championship. The major factor that hampered SV's season were his motor failures.
Old Mar 20, 2010 | 12:34 PM
  #558  
Ryan.Kauz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
From: Your mamy's bedroom
they need the fuel. Its well known that prancing stallions use more energy than red bulls during races.

(if I could draw you would get a colorful animation of gay italian horses playing with giant red bulls around a troff being filled with cash by Bernie who is bathed in light comming down from the heavens..... and it turns out to be a overhead lamp used during night-races)
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 10:06 AM
  #559  
Billy@EnglishRacing's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,458
Likes: 0
From: Puyallup, wa
Renault has gotten the green light to make a few improvements to there engines, but only in the fields of cost and reliability. There are not being able to improve there engines fuel economy at all.

http://www.planetf1.com/news/18227/6...engine-changes
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 05:50 PM
  #560  
KPerez's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by Billy@EnglishRacing
Renault has gotten the green light to make a few improvements to there engines, but only in the fields of cost and reliability. There are not being able to improve there engines fuel economy at all.

http://www.planetf1.com/news/18227/6...engine-changes
Yes, this is true but if in the process of "improving reliability" at "lower costs" also results remarkedly in increased mileage, then this is within the rules....I am sure they are all going to play these inadvertent outcomes to the hilt.

Later, Ken
Old Mar 22, 2010 | 05:30 AM
  #561  
KPerez's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by bluestreak
I disagree. Ferrari are easily the TEAM to beat, and Red Bull has been plagued by reliability issues since last year and obviously have not resolved them. Combine that with everyone driving all conservative to learn the proper strategy, Alonso blazing fast laps at the end of the race, and two top level drivers and it's easy to see why Ferrari are the favorites. The Renault simply isn't consistent enough, and is bound to be well off the pace at a few races this year while also likely running thin on engines as well.

There is no driver lineup that even comes close to the Ferrari pair. Aside from my clear Hamilton bias I have to say that Alonso + Ferrari is looking tough to beat this year. Not to mention that last year Ferrari and McLaren both proved that they are capable of staggering improvement speeds. So by the end of this season it could very well be Ferrari vs McLaren again. Or, at least Ferrari vs Hamilton as Button hasn't proven anything.


If Red Bull had a Mercedes engine I might change that opinion, but even still Vettel seems to have more problems with his car than Webber and Red Bull more problems than other Renault teams. Possible that Newey's on the edge designs are bad for consistency.
This recently from Hamilton: “The Red Bull is ridiculously fast,...“They have got the fastest car by quite a big margin. They should be quite a lot further ahead in general.”

So RB has the fastest car at this point in time and UR point about the reliability of the Renault engine is based upon last year's results. As pointed out earlier, the misshap with Vettel's car in Bahrain was not the Renualt engine per se but rather a component made by other. Now RB has used this incident to request and has received approval to modify their engine, as Bill has just pointed out, to make changes to same to increase "reliability". In short, there is no current evidence to suggest the Renault engine will perform or, should I say, fail as it did last year. And now that they have approval to go and make additional changes, should only increase its reliability (and probably other things as well) further. Red Bull Racing is, therefore, the team to beat this year IFF everything remains equal from here on out...which it probably will not; Mercedes and McLaren along with Ferrari are burning the midnight oil to obtain more pace and better fuel economy. Time will tell if they are successful.

Later, Ken
Old Mar 22, 2010 | 04:56 PM
  #562  
ODUB's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 2
From: Baton Rouge, Louisiana
**** Alonso...discuss?
Old Mar 23, 2010 | 05:10 AM
  #563  
evokw's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: .....
The problem might be that the red bull engineers made a mistake with the fuel tanks size. they realized that the fuel wasnt enough to power vettel till the end of the race, hens the loss of power because they had to de-tune the engine to spend less fuel and finish the race. thats why vettels car ran out of fuel after the race was over and vettel didnt get it back to the pits. vettels car is so fast cuz its lighter than the rest
Old Mar 23, 2010 | 06:07 AM
  #564  
KPerez's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by evokw
The problem might be that the red bull engineers made a mistake with the fuel tanks size. they realized that the fuel wasnt enough to power vettel till the end of the race, hens the loss of power because they had to de-tune the engine to spend less fuel and finish the race. thats why vettels car ran out of fuel after the race was over and vettel didnt get it back to the pits. vettels car is so fast cuz its lighter than the rest
I do not think RB made a mistake when determining the size of the fuel tank but rather how much fuel to put in at the start. Specifically, there are two things: better aero package from Newey and running as little fuel as possible to run light but yet still be able to finish the race. This is the only drama/strategy playing out here..run light, save fuel and save tires but still be quick enough to stay ahead of field. That said, I think Vettel ran out of fuel at the end was the result of very poor mileage when the spark plug failed; loosing a cyl usually results in poor performance and higher fuel consumption...LOL

Later, Ken
Old Mar 23, 2010 | 06:19 AM
  #565  
KPerez's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by ODUB
**** Alonso...discuss?
A man of few words...if U mean how does driver fit in here, the answer is all the top drivers are a factor but it is the machine that they are driving that usually determines the winner. I know this is debatable but when a team wins IMHO the strategy and machine are more important than the driver because I think the latter are all quite close. It is difficult to separate man from machine here when it comes to the lap times. The only real way to determine this would be to have all the drivers drive the same car, on the same course and on the same day which never happens in F1. That said, the experienced drivers (Alonso, Massa, Hamilton, Button, etc.) that know the course and racing strategies will outperform the new younger drivers irrespective of the car.
Probably opened a can of worms here but this happens when one responds to a criptic message.

Later, Ken
Old Mar 23, 2010 | 06:22 AM
  #566  
GG06MR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 5
From: SATown
Originally Posted by ODUB
**** Alonso...discuss?
Is that to say F*ck Alonso? If so....
Old Mar 23, 2010 | 06:24 AM
  #567  
grillpt's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,680
Likes: 5
From: 610
I don't think that Vettel ran out of fuel... that car sounded horrible. I don't think they have the capability of shutting down cylinders from the pit wall to save fuel. Maybe you guys discussed this already, if so I missed it sorry.
Old Mar 23, 2010 | 05:10 PM
  #568  
Billy@EnglishRacing's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,458
Likes: 0
From: Puyallup, wa
I don't believe that Red Bull made a error when it came to fuel amount. They have done enough testing to make sure something like that didn't happen. Plus the car would not have sounded like it did.
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 03:53 AM
  #569  
ODUB's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 2
From: Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Originally Posted by GG06MR
Is that to say F*ck Alonso? If so....
yes. i hate alonso. i respect him as a driver because he is indeed a hell of a driver, but i just hate him. not a fan of short with extra large heads. he's just such a douche.
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 06:12 AM
  #570  
GG06MR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 5
From: SATown
Originally Posted by ODUB
yes. i hate alonso. i respect him as a driver because he is indeed a hell of a driver, but i just hate him. not a fan of short with extra large heads. he's just such a douche.
Yeah, I've hated the guy ever since his team wore "Schumacher Who?" t-shirts under their fire suits at the race he clinched his 1st driver championship.


Quick Reply: Official 2010 Formula One Discussion F1



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:14 PM.