Notices
Motor Sports If you like rallying, road racing, autoxing, or track events, then this is the spot for you.

Official 2010 Formula One Discussion F1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 23, 2010, 09:13 AM
  #916  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
donour's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tennessee, USA
Posts: 2,502
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by jvb6806

Nice. I'm in the grandstands directly ahead (34). I can kinda-sorta make out my group.

d
Old Jun 23, 2010, 10:34 AM
  #917  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
GG06MR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SATown
Posts: 1,176
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Ludikraut
Looks like the 107% rule is back for 2011, along with a ridiculous movable rear wing rule. Sometimes I really wonder WTF FIA is thinking ... if at all. 107% rule is going to kill the new teams. With the lack of in-season testing, the races play a significant role in collecting data on an F1 car. If a new team can't qualify for the race, they've effectively lost 25-50% of their testing time.
l8r)
True, but 7% on a 1:30 lap is over 6 seconds, and 7% on a 1:45 lap is over 7 seconds, so there is a BIG window there. In my opinion, if they bring a car that is 6+ seconds per lap slower than the fastest car there, then they don't deserve to have the car on track during the race. Besides, how much testing can they really be doing during the race if they're lapping that far off the pace and spending nearly the whole race trying to get out of the way of the top ten or so cars anyway?!?! Virgin and HRT are good examples of that, since neither of them have really shown any significant improvement, i.e. they're still finishing 2-5 laps down after having 8 races worth of testing.....if they even finish the race.
Old Jun 23, 2010, 01:26 PM
  #918  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (56)
 
KevinD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i understand the cost cutting measures... but the no testing thing really blows. i think everyone would be much closer if they got a decent amount of on track testing in the off season. without the on track testing, its just who can model and simulate the car the best.


so which F1 teams are looking for a mechanical engineer with 6 years matlab/simulink experiencing doing simulation and controls for various military applications?
Old Jun 24, 2010, 04:15 AM
  #919  
Evolved Member
 
KPerez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GG06MR
True, but 7% on a 1:30 lap is over 6 seconds, and 7% on a 1:45 lap is over 7 seconds, so there is a BIG window there. In my opinion, if they bring a car that is 6+ seconds per lap slower than the fastest car there, then they don't deserve to have the car on track during the race. Besides, how much testing can they really be doing during the race if they're lapping that far off the pace and spending nearly the whole race trying to get out of the way of the top ten or so cars anyway?!?! Virgin and HRT are good examples of that, since neither of them have really shown any significant improvement, i.e. they're still finishing 2-5 laps down after having 8 races worth of testing.....if they even finish the race.
This is a good point. I suspect the motivation for the reinstatement is throwing a bone to Ferrari who has been b***tchin about the slower teams...i.e., hoping they will not be able to meet rule and, therefore, are either out of race or forced into trying even harder to be competitive.

Later, Ken
Old Jun 24, 2010, 05:16 AM
  #920  
Evolved Member
 
KPerez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Adjustable Body Parts: going in wrong direction?

When the FIA came out with an adjustable rear wing coupled with a banning of the the F-duct for 2011, I thought (see earlier post) that the result would be the same, namely decrease rear downforce thereby decreasing drag and increasing straight line speed. However, according the James Allen, the rear wing when electronically activated "...will...give the car following another more downforce, to encourage an overtake."That is, instead of decreasing the wing profile they will increase it. So activation of the wing on the straight will only slow down the following car preventing overtaking. So, if I am reading this correctly, the only place it would be advantageous was in those turns where no braking is required (since braking deactivates wing) but a tap on the brakes after the turn and pass would be needed to get wing back to lower drag postion. I may be confused here OR J Allen has it all wrong. Can somebody clarify this for me?

Later, Ken
Old Jun 24, 2010, 06:05 AM
  #921  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
grillpt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: 610
Posts: 2,680
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by KevinD
i understand the cost cutting measures... but the no testing thing really blows. i think everyone would be much closer if they got a decent amount of on track testing in the off season. without the on track testing, its just who can model and simulate the car the best.


so which F1 teams are looking for a mechanical engineer with 6 years matlab/simulink experiencing doing simulation and controls for various military applications?
I heard USF1 is hiring.

Originally Posted by KPerez
When the FIA came out with an adjustable rear wing coupled with a banning of the the F-duct for 2011, I thought (see earlier post) that the result would be the same, namely decrease rear downforce thereby decreasing drag and increasing straight line speed. However, according the James Allen, the rear wing when electronically activated "...will...give the car following another more downforce, to encourage an overtake."That is, instead of decreasing the wing profile they will increase it. So activation of the wing on the straight will only slow down the following car preventing overtaking. So, if I am reading this correctly, the only place it would be advantageous was in those turns where no braking is required (since braking deactivates wing) but a tap on the brakes after the turn and pass would be needed to get wing back to lower drag postion. I may be confused here OR J Allen has it all wrong. Can somebody clarify this for me?

Later, Ken
The way I understand it the moveable rear wing will only be allowed to be used be the overtaking car. Also, the FIA and/or the Pitwall will let a driver know by the control panel on the steering wheel when the system can be activated... So what I take from that is if your the car leading they will not allow you to activate the system, I could be wrong, but thats the way it reads to me...
Old Jun 24, 2010, 10:36 AM
  #922  
Evolved Member
 
KPerez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by grillpt
I heard USF1 is hiring.



The way I understand it the moveable rear wing will only be allowed to be used be the overtaking car. Also, the FIA and/or the Pitwall will let a driver know by the control panel on the steering wheel when the system can be activated... So what I take from that is if your the car leading they will not allow you to activate the system, I could be wrong, but thats the way it reads to me...
^ but the question is does the activation decrease or increase downforce to following driver?...if latter, then the passing will occur just before or into turns where it would be an advantage; if the former, then activation will occur on the straights providing least drag yeilding higher straight line speed.

Later, Ken
Old Jun 24, 2010, 11:38 AM
  #923  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
GG06MR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SATown
Posts: 1,176
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by KPerez
^ but the question is does the activation decrease or increase downforce to following driver?...if latter, then the passing will occur just before or into turns where it would be an advantage; if the former, then activation will occur on the straights providing least drag yeilding higher straight line speed.

Later, Ken
Sounds like a typo to me. I don't think they'd disallow the F-duct in favor of an adjustable rear wing and then determine that the standard position of the wing would be the reduced downforce setting.
Old Jun 24, 2010, 09:56 PM
  #924  
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
jvb6806's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NW suburbs
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by the FIA

The grid

From 2011, any driver whose best qualifying lap exceeds 107% of the fastest Q1 qualifying time will not be allowed to take part in the race. Under exceptional circumstances, however, which may include setting a suitable lap time in a free practice session, the stewards may permit the car to start the race. Should there be more than one driver accepted in this manner, the grid order will be determined by the stewards.

Driver adjustable bodywork

From 2011, adjustable bodywork may be activated by the driver at any time prior to the start of the race and, for the sole purpose of improving overtaking opportunities during the race, after the driver has completed two laps. The driver may only activate the adjustable bodywork in the race when he has been notified via the control electronics that it is enabled. It will only be enabled if the driver is less than one second behind another at any of the pre-determined positions around each circuit. The system will be disabled the first time the driver uses the brakes after the system has been activated. The FIA may, after consulting all the competitors, adjust the time proximity in order to ensure the purpose of the adjustable bodywork is met..
they also added a section to the rules about finishing the race under caution (freakin schumacher) and a rule that says you must return to the grid after qualifying and practice under your own power for fuel scrutineering. but it was pretty funny to see hamilton jump out of the car and walk along side it down casino, we all just kinda looked at each other as he drove past sitting on the side pod waving after quali wondering if he ran out of fuel.

the rule says nothing about the aero adjustments only going in one direction. maybe they will have an up and a down for the rear wing for passing on the straights and in low speed corners. it also says that it can only be used at "pre-determined positions around each circuit" so maybe they will only allow it on the straights or in the typical areas of overtaking.

i think this will push more people to use KERS next year because if the person behind you has less rear wing and 80 more HP passing should be "easy." Ferrari has already said they are running it next year and i think cosworth is working on it for their teams as well.

Last edited by jvb6806; Jun 24, 2010 at 10:05 PM.
Old Jun 25, 2010, 03:55 AM
  #925  
Evolved Member
 
KPerez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GG06MR
Sounds like a typo to me. I don't think they'd disallow the F-duct in favor of an adjustable rear wing and then determine that the standard position of the wing would be the reduced downforce setting.
Well, as it turns out, it was not a typo but rather James Allen has it all wrong...Specifically, the adjustable rear wing is, " where drivers will be able to open up the slot gap in their rear wing for a straight-line speed boost to help overtake cars ahead of them."So the rear wing's downforce will be reduced, NOT increased, when actuated by the driver at specific points on the grid following pit approval.
Ok, so we know how it works but these restrictions look rediculous to me...use at specified sections of track...only following cars can use it IFF they are within one second of the lead car...use only after first two laps...way, way to complicated...just have it available for the drivers to use whenever, wherever. This is the way it is now with the F-duct for those that have it. Why is the FIA getting in here and making the application of this feature so ****? I guess this is the way all organizations evolve...screw up that for which it was designed...it is called the ultimate bureaucracy.

Later, Ken
Old Jun 25, 2010, 12:56 PM
  #926  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
 
DaWorstPlaya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,216
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by KPerez
Ok, so we know how it works but these restrictions look rediculous to me...use at specified sections of track...only following cars can use it IFF they are within one second of the lead car...use only after first two laps...way, way to complicated...just have it available for the drivers to use whenever, wherever. This is the way it is now with the F-duct for those that have it. Why is the FIA getting in here and making the application of this feature so ****? I guess this is the way all organizations evolve...screw up that for which it was designed...it is called the ultimate bureaucracy.

Later, Ken
I couldn't agree more!
Old Jun 25, 2010, 05:53 PM
  #927  
Newbie
 
zignus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sucks I can't watch it live. Sunday morning I will have to stay off the internet till Fox gets around to showing the race.
Old Jun 26, 2010, 06:42 AM
  #928  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
newevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: indy
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hulkenberg & petrov q3 ?????? & wth schumi needs to go back into retirement its either shumi now sucks or merc isnt putting as much money into developement as they should.
Old Jun 26, 2010, 09:10 AM
  #929  
Newbie
 
zignus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by newevil
hulkenberg & petrov q3 ?????? & wth schumi needs to go back into retirement its either shumi now sucks or merc isnt putting as much money into developement as they should.
Didn't merc say they were going to stop spending money on development for this year and focus on next year?
Old Jun 26, 2010, 11:33 AM
  #930  
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
jvb6806's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NW suburbs
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
did anyone else notice lee diffy trying to make the time more exciting then they actually were?

"so and so is only 4 tenths off the pace through sector 2!"

i feel kinda bad for the people that watched their first F1 race last weekend on fox. if this race is a parade like it was last year and people will lose interest again.


Quick Reply: Official 2010 Formula One Discussion F1



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:53 AM.