Girodisc Super Ultralite Rotors Group Buy
Feb 5, 2010, 11:16 AM
#1
Girodisc Super Ultralite Rotors Group Buy
Buschur now has a group buy set up for the ultralite Girodisc rotors I ran last year. Call his shop if you want to get in on it. I think he said they need 5 orders to make them.
Legal for SM and BSP. Not legal in STU or AS classes.
Here is Buschur's thread:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...ml#post7960874
Legal for SM and BSP. Not legal in STU or AS classes.
Here is Buschur's thread:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...ml#post7960874
Feb 9, 2010, 05:49 AM
#4
Buschur now has a group buy set up for the ultralite Girodisc rotors I ran last year. Call his shop if you want to get in on it. I think he said they need 5 orders to make them.
Legal for SM and BSP. Not legal in STU or AS classes.
Here is Buschur's thread:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...ml#post7960874
Legal for SM and BSP. Not legal in STU or AS classes.
Here is Buschur's thread:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...ml#post7960874
Feb 9, 2010, 02:35 PM
#5
Jarrod, would it be a good idea to add to your review that the discs are very suitable for street use? I heard that the powers-that-be read that they wouldn't be good for street application, hence the proposal ban.
Last edited by SS RX7 r2; Feb 9, 2010 at 02:46 PM.
Feb 9, 2010, 06:03 PM
#6
There is no "proposed ban". It's right there in the 2010 rules - it IS banned for STU. . .
14.6.E: STX and STU: Non-standard brake rotors may be used provided they
are of equal or larger dimensions (diameter and thickness) and made
of ferrous material (e.g. iron). Thickness includes the individual plates
of a vented rotor, as well as the overall dimension.
This has NOTING to do with streetability or safety (although that was their argument) and EVERYTHING to do with inter and intra-class politics. . .
These are perfectly streetable. Period. No question about that.
14.6.E: STX and STU: Non-standard brake rotors may be used provided they
are of equal or larger dimensions (diameter and thickness) and made
of ferrous material (e.g. iron). Thickness includes the individual plates
of a vented rotor, as well as the overall dimension.
This has NOTING to do with streetability or safety (although that was their argument) and EVERYTHING to do with inter and intra-class politics. . .
These are perfectly streetable. Period. No question about that.
Feb 9, 2010, 07:13 PM
#7
There is no "proposed ban". It's right there in the 2010 rules - it IS banned for STU. . .
14.6.E: STX and STU: Non-standard brake rotors may be used provided they
are of equal or larger dimensions (diameter and thickness) and made
of ferrous material (e.g. iron). Thickness includes the individual plates
of a vented rotor, as well as the overall dimension.
This has NOTING to do with streetability or safety (although that was their argument) and EVERYTHING to do with inter and intra-class politics. . .
These are perfectly streetable. Period. No question about that.
14.6.E: STX and STU: Non-standard brake rotors may be used provided they
are of equal or larger dimensions (diameter and thickness) and made
of ferrous material (e.g. iron). Thickness includes the individual plates
of a vented rotor, as well as the overall dimension.
This has NOTING to do with streetability or safety (although that was their argument) and EVERYTHING to do with inter and intra-class politics. . .
These are perfectly streetable. Period. No question about that.
Did I say IMO?
Trending Topics
Feb 9, 2010, 07:55 PM
#8
And which do you think is safer for stopping a race car - a racing spec $400 Ferrari rotor that is worn (or machined) down maybe just a little past what the MFR states - or a $20 OEM flat blade 10" rear rotor from any old 80's crapbox??
ALSO, with regards to cross drilling your rotors - I would LOVE to see a scientific test of a rotor lightened 20% via cross drilling vs. lightened 20% with this method. I will put $$$$$$$$ on the thin walled discs holding up longer with the cross drilled ones cracking and flying apart sooner.
ALSO, with regards to cross drilling your rotors - I would LOVE to see a scientific test of a rotor lightened 20% via cross drilling vs. lightened 20% with this method. I will put $$$$$$$$ on the thin walled discs holding up longer with the cross drilled ones cracking and flying apart sooner.
Last edited by EVOlutionary; Feb 9, 2010 at 07:59 PM.
Feb 10, 2010, 06:12 AM
#9
There is no "proposed ban". It's right there in the 2010 rules - it IS banned for STU. . .
14.6.E: STX and STU: Non-standard brake rotors may be used provided they
are of equal or larger dimensions (diameter and thickness) and made
of ferrous material (e.g. iron). Thickness includes the individual plates
of a vented rotor, as well as the overall dimension.
This has NOTING to do with streetability or safety (although that was their argument) and EVERYTHING to do with inter and intra-class politics. . .
These are perfectly streetable. Period. No question about that.
14.6.E: STX and STU: Non-standard brake rotors may be used provided they
are of equal or larger dimensions (diameter and thickness) and made
of ferrous material (e.g. iron). Thickness includes the individual plates
of a vented rotor, as well as the overall dimension.
This has NOTING to do with streetability or safety (although that was their argument) and EVERYTHING to do with inter and intra-class politics. . .
These are perfectly streetable. Period. No question about that.
