Does anyone like NASCAR racing?
#91
Evolved Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by cupOZnj
[B]and not all tracks are banked like daytona. daytona is 26 degrees, most of the others are FAR less....daytona is set up so that the cars can go max speed 100% of the race which is VERY demanding on the automobile and the driver. B]
[B]and not all tracks are banked like daytona. daytona is 26 degrees, most of the others are FAR less....daytona is set up so that the cars can go max speed 100% of the race which is VERY demanding on the automobile and the driver. B]
Originally posted by cupOZnj
i disagree with the athelete comment. i believe golfers are atheletes, as much as race car drivers, etc. a skill would be like computer programming, or something. i consider anything that pits physical and mental challenges against a person for competetion athletic. if this definition were restricted to so called traditional atheletes...then i think the only true "athletes" are those that compete in track and field.
i disagree with the athelete comment. i believe golfers are atheletes, as much as race car drivers, etc. a skill would be like computer programming, or something. i consider anything that pits physical and mental challenges against a person for competetion athletic. if this definition were restricted to so called traditional atheletes...then i think the only true "athletes" are those that compete in track and field.
Originally posted by cupOZnj
btw-drag racers are VERY VERY good drivers. it's not just reaction time....they have to constantly adjust and make quick decisions the whole quater mile. if you don't believe me....go test drive a viper (or car with insane power) and try and hold all that power straight at full throttle. i've heard numerous stories of people rapping their viper around a pole 10 seconds after they drive it off the lot cause they can't handle the power.
btw-drag racers are VERY VERY good drivers. it's not just reaction time....they have to constantly adjust and make quick decisions the whole quater mile. if you don't believe me....go test drive a viper (or car with insane power) and try and hold all that power straight at full throttle. i've heard numerous stories of people rapping their viper around a pole 10 seconds after they drive it off the lot cause they can't handle the power.
#92
i beg to differ. you can't be a fat-*** and be a good driver. there is a lot of endurance involved in racing. plus just the concentration and strain will keep you in shape. mucho stamina. are they in the same category as hockey players? no.
#94
Evolved Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
many of todays pro drivers are in excellent shape, esp those involoved in long events. Look at Mark Martin - Men's Health did a write up on him a couple of years ago - I hope I look that good at his age....
but there are plenty of exceptions: lets look at John Force - we will all agree that he is an excellent drag racer, but not exactly a paragon of fitness....
btw - concentration & strain lead to high bloodpressure & strokes, not good endurance.
but there are plenty of exceptions: lets look at John Force - we will all agree that he is an excellent drag racer, but not exactly a paragon of fitness....
btw - concentration & strain lead to high bloodpressure & strokes, not good endurance.
#96
Evolved Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Butt Dyno
concentration, doing the same thing for 4 hours, bla bla bla.
by that standard, anyone who's finished 100% of gran turismo, with all the endurance races, is an athlete
-bd
concentration, doing the same thing for 4 hours, bla bla bla.
by that standard, anyone who's finished 100% of gran turismo, with all the endurance races, is an athlete
-bd
#97
Evolved Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: TB, FL
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"but to try and make the sport safer. yeah, crashes happen even on restrictor plate courses, but they feel that it would be more dangerous without them. i would like to think that higher ups in nascar development know what they are doing to introduce this."
Are you kidding me? There are more big name deaths since the introduction of restrictor plates . . . they aren't even going that fast too.
NASCAR made that flip-up foil if the car gets airbourne. Safety and speed are not the issue here. If so, NASCAR better start R&D in making the roll cage a lot stronger. Look at CART and IRL, they've made their chassis and tub stronger and more foot space.
W/o restrictor plate, the stronger cars have the ability to pull out of a draft, not acting like a scared lemming. I guess you like lemming racing.
"this is the best part of the sport. seeing cars do 180+mph 6inches from other cars is what is so exciting. they are constantly battling back and forth, which brings real drama to the competition."
Are you saying that the pre-restrictor plate yrs of racing suck because of lack of watchability. You're nuts. Better look in the mirror amongst big time drivers . . . they all hate restrictor plates from Big Dale to Rusty to MArtin.
"again-american drivers, on american soil, driving american cars. fans don't want anything else."
Are you blind? Why did Bill France Jr introduced NASCAR in Japan? Not a marketing ploy to add new viewers or wet tha appetite of japanese automakers? I guess NASCAR wanted to flaunted how NASCAR is the world's best racing format.
Are NASCAR and its fans afraid that their fav driver like Rusty driving a penske Toyo Camry or the Hendricks sporting an Accord? Or within 3 yrs, the japanese automakers will dominate the sport . . . it didn't take too long for those two companies dominate CART to much chagrin to me as a Chevy and Mercedes fan onboard Ilmor.
These are the Q's that I've ask you, but you just skirt around them . . . acting like France Jr isn't a marketing genius. Yes, he exploited the rift/greed between CART and Tony George. Yes, he took advantage of IMSA board members revolting amongst themselves. That's history. If you don't believe me, look it up. France Jr is a very savvy man like Vince M of WWE against Ted Turner . . . in the end, Vince destroyed the media millionaire.
Also, I'm willing to bet I know more NASCAR than you . . . when did you start watching NASCAR? I started when I was a teen in 85. There is no way you have watched more NASCAR than me. Just the last 2 yrs, I've given it up completely!
"The main reason why Toyota and/or Honda isn't in it yet is because they do not build a factory V-8."
There is nothing fatory about NASCAR's engines. They are a bunch of crate engines ranging from 5.5L to 7.4L (somewhere around there) in a sliding scale.
Both Honda and Toyo (V8 tundra) can pull their blocks from CART. I'm not saying Honda is going to pull their F1 engine block and make it carby and ask NASCAR for a sliding scale. That won't fly. There will be an uproar!
Are you kidding me? There are more big name deaths since the introduction of restrictor plates . . . they aren't even going that fast too.
NASCAR made that flip-up foil if the car gets airbourne. Safety and speed are not the issue here. If so, NASCAR better start R&D in making the roll cage a lot stronger. Look at CART and IRL, they've made their chassis and tub stronger and more foot space.
W/o restrictor plate, the stronger cars have the ability to pull out of a draft, not acting like a scared lemming. I guess you like lemming racing.
"this is the best part of the sport. seeing cars do 180+mph 6inches from other cars is what is so exciting. they are constantly battling back and forth, which brings real drama to the competition."
Are you saying that the pre-restrictor plate yrs of racing suck because of lack of watchability. You're nuts. Better look in the mirror amongst big time drivers . . . they all hate restrictor plates from Big Dale to Rusty to MArtin.
"again-american drivers, on american soil, driving american cars. fans don't want anything else."
Are you blind? Why did Bill France Jr introduced NASCAR in Japan? Not a marketing ploy to add new viewers or wet tha appetite of japanese automakers? I guess NASCAR wanted to flaunted how NASCAR is the world's best racing format.
Are NASCAR and its fans afraid that their fav driver like Rusty driving a penske Toyo Camry or the Hendricks sporting an Accord? Or within 3 yrs, the japanese automakers will dominate the sport . . . it didn't take too long for those two companies dominate CART to much chagrin to me as a Chevy and Mercedes fan onboard Ilmor.
These are the Q's that I've ask you, but you just skirt around them . . . acting like France Jr isn't a marketing genius. Yes, he exploited the rift/greed between CART and Tony George. Yes, he took advantage of IMSA board members revolting amongst themselves. That's history. If you don't believe me, look it up. France Jr is a very savvy man like Vince M of WWE against Ted Turner . . . in the end, Vince destroyed the media millionaire.
Also, I'm willing to bet I know more NASCAR than you . . . when did you start watching NASCAR? I started when I was a teen in 85. There is no way you have watched more NASCAR than me. Just the last 2 yrs, I've given it up completely!
"The main reason why Toyota and/or Honda isn't in it yet is because they do not build a factory V-8."
There is nothing fatory about NASCAR's engines. They are a bunch of crate engines ranging from 5.5L to 7.4L (somewhere around there) in a sliding scale.
Both Honda and Toyo (V8 tundra) can pull their blocks from CART. I'm not saying Honda is going to pull their F1 engine block and make it carby and ask NASCAR for a sliding scale. That won't fly. There will be an uproar!
#98
Evolved Member
by that standard, anyone who's finished 100% of gran turismo, with all the endurance races, is an athlete
if you removed all the stickers from a NASCAR, could you tell the difference from a Dodge & Ford? How about during a race? I know F1 cars look a lot alike, but that is because they are going for a 100% max aero-downforce car at 99.9% of the rules set up by the FIA.
I am entitled to think NASCAR is stupid as much as I want - that whole freedom of speech thing...
#100
restrictor plates have NOT caused deaths. other safety factors have. that's why they increased safety measures in other parts of the car too. like the head restraint. how can you say that by limiting a cars top speed (thereby driving slower) it actually CAUSES deaths? just because they introduce a safety measure, and someone dies, doesn't mean that particular safety feature was to blame. it could possibly be some other reason. in fact i'm willing to bet there would be even MORE deaths if restrictor plates hadn't been introduced, due to the ever-increasing power of the cars. also, i fail to see why nascar restrictor plates is a reason to hate the sport as a whole. they only use them on a couple of the tracks. and as said before, other sports use restriction methods also.
"Are you saying that the pre-restrictor plate yrs of racing suck because of lack of watchability. You're nuts. Better look in the mirror amongst big time drivers . . . they all hate restrictor plates from Big Dale to Rusty to MArtin."
i never said that. i think i was commenting on what i find exciting about the sport, not having ANYTHING to do with restrictor plates. please keep things in context. i never said anything about nascar sucks.
the fact is...these are still not very valid reasons to HATE the sport. you HATE it because they use restrictor plates, and that all cars are american? that's like saying you hate baseball cause they can't use aluminum bats, or you hate hockey because of the two-line pass rule. if you think it's boring...that's one thing. putting the entire sport down because of some of it's quirks...i guess that's your loss.
"Are you saying that the pre-restrictor plate yrs of racing suck because of lack of watchability. You're nuts. Better look in the mirror amongst big time drivers . . . they all hate restrictor plates from Big Dale to Rusty to MArtin."
i never said that. i think i was commenting on what i find exciting about the sport, not having ANYTHING to do with restrictor plates. please keep things in context. i never said anything about nascar sucks.
the fact is...these are still not very valid reasons to HATE the sport. you HATE it because they use restrictor plates, and that all cars are american? that's like saying you hate baseball cause they can't use aluminum bats, or you hate hockey because of the two-line pass rule. if you think it's boring...that's one thing. putting the entire sport down because of some of it's quirks...i guess that's your loss.
#101
http://www.howstuffworks.com/nascar.htm
http://www.howstuffworks.com/nascar-safety.htm
you might just learn something.....
http://www.howstuffworks.com/nascar-safety.htm
you might just learn something.....
#102
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Hartford, WI
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree on rmoving restrictor plates.
Originally posted by bahamut
"but to try and make the sport safer. yeah, crashes happen even on restrictor plate courses, but they feel that it would be more dangerous without them. i would like to think that higher ups in nascar development know what they are doing to introduce this."
W/o restrictor plate, the stronger cars have the ability to pull out of a draft, not acting like a scared lemming. I guess you like lemming racing.
"but to try and make the sport safer. yeah, crashes happen even on restrictor plate courses, but they feel that it would be more dangerous without them. i would like to think that higher ups in nascar development know what they are doing to introduce this."
W/o restrictor plate, the stronger cars have the ability to pull out of a draft, not acting like a scared lemming. I guess you like lemming racing.
#103
Evolving Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lebanon, IN
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
After working for 2 years on a NASCAR Busch Grand National pit crew, and being a racing fan since the age of 14 or so (almost 30 years worth), I think that all forms of motorsports are good. There are some I prefer to watch over others but hey, racing is racing. One big advantage that Nascar has over most all other forms of motorsports is that there are so many hometown track where for less than $10,000, you can get a hobby stock car and go racing for the season. This enables thousands of racing fans to try to live out their dream of being the superstar racer. It's where I got my start in stock cars. I worked for a guy at a local track for 3 years and managed to meet the right person who introduced me to a team in the BGN. After trying out for a year I was hired on as a weekend crew member. It was a chance to live out a dream. I will always look back on that time as one of the best of my life.
The restrictor plates were developed to make the racing safer for the fans, not the drivers. Untill Earnhardt Sr. died there was not alot of emphasis put into safety. But without the restrictor plates the cars were getting near the point that is they got turned they would literaly fly over the fence into the crowd. Bobby Allison and Richard Petty both came close to going over the fence. The effect would kill the sport. I hate plate racing as much as the next guy but until they find a easier way to slow them down it's a fact of life in NASCAR.
As far as not being tech. advanced, no they don't match up to F-1 or IRL, but in NASCAR more emphasis is placed on team than just driver. Watch the pit stops close once, they look so easy to do. I have changed front tires, rear tires, worked as gasman and my main job was catch can man. To do what the top teams are doing is unbelieveable. I like that they still us a pump jack, and 5 lug wheels instead of a air hose and single lug wheels. I also liked the fuel we used compared to CART or IRL. Ours was less explosive and we can see the flames.
I got the opportunity to drive one of our cars after a race once back to the car hauler, all I can say here was HOT DAMN. because of the NASCAR officials I couldn't go fast but I could jump the throttle a couple of times and YEEEEHAAAAAW. When I was working back at the local track I was able to go out on the track a few times during a practice session and give it a few laps. It's alot harder than it looks.
I am not going to try to convince anyone to convert to NASCAR, I like the racing and the people that I got the chance to work with and meet. I still watch it closely as I have friends still in it and wish I still could be there on race weekend but I also like watching WRC, Drag Racing (Go John Force, one crazy dude!!) and some IRL or Cart racing.
The restrictor plates were developed to make the racing safer for the fans, not the drivers. Untill Earnhardt Sr. died there was not alot of emphasis put into safety. But without the restrictor plates the cars were getting near the point that is they got turned they would literaly fly over the fence into the crowd. Bobby Allison and Richard Petty both came close to going over the fence. The effect would kill the sport. I hate plate racing as much as the next guy but until they find a easier way to slow them down it's a fact of life in NASCAR.
As far as not being tech. advanced, no they don't match up to F-1 or IRL, but in NASCAR more emphasis is placed on team than just driver. Watch the pit stops close once, they look so easy to do. I have changed front tires, rear tires, worked as gasman and my main job was catch can man. To do what the top teams are doing is unbelieveable. I like that they still us a pump jack, and 5 lug wheels instead of a air hose and single lug wheels. I also liked the fuel we used compared to CART or IRL. Ours was less explosive and we can see the flames.
I got the opportunity to drive one of our cars after a race once back to the car hauler, all I can say here was HOT DAMN. because of the NASCAR officials I couldn't go fast but I could jump the throttle a couple of times and YEEEEHAAAAAW. When I was working back at the local track I was able to go out on the track a few times during a practice session and give it a few laps. It's alot harder than it looks.
I am not going to try to convince anyone to convert to NASCAR, I like the racing and the people that I got the chance to work with and meet. I still watch it closely as I have friends still in it and wish I still could be there on race weekend but I also like watching WRC, Drag Racing (Go John Force, one crazy dude!!) and some IRL or Cart racing.
#104
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Hartford, WI
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Restrictor Plates
The restrictor plates were developed to make the racing safer for the fans, not the drivers. Untill Earnhardt Sr. died there was not alot of emphasis put into safety. But without the restrictor plates the cars were getting near the point that is they got turned they would literaly fly over the fence into the crowd.
Look at the stats of NASCAR deaths. In the recent past there have been more deaths than in the 35 or 40 years before this.
#105
Evolving Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lebanon, IN
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FSJRULES, I am fully aware that restrictor plates have been around more than a couple of years. I am talking about the NASCAR mandated safety items. Most safety items were left up to the team and driver. I applaud NASCAR in setting these stricter safety rules but alot more can be done. They are testing to see if a higher greenhouse will slow down the cars enough to take away the restrcitor plate and make it easier for the taller/larger drivers to get in and out of the cars. They are also looking into the roof hatch simular to the NHRA one for a quick escape for the driver.
As far as the number of deaths, remember that NASCAR didn't keep very good records from the start. I beg to differ that there have been more deaths in recent years than the 35-40 previous. These recent deaths have been some highly public ones, with Earnhardt Sr., Adam Petty, Kenny Irwin to name a few.
I still love NASCAR racing and most all forms of motorsports, but I hate seeing anyone get killed doing it. I know it is a dangerous sport and I have seen first hand what these cars can go through. But just like the street cars we drive, more can be done to add safety without taking away from the racing.
As far as the number of deaths, remember that NASCAR didn't keep very good records from the start. I beg to differ that there have been more deaths in recent years than the 35-40 previous. These recent deaths have been some highly public ones, with Earnhardt Sr., Adam Petty, Kenny Irwin to name a few.
I still love NASCAR racing and most all forms of motorsports, but I hate seeing anyone get killed doing it. I know it is a dangerous sport and I have seen first hand what these cars can go through. But just like the street cars we drive, more can be done to add safety without taking away from the racing.