MBC install
#1
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MBC install
Which one of these two methods do most of you use?
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...vo-rx-pro.html
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...vo-rx-pro.html
#5
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Burnaby, BC
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
haha nice. i just did this. on the light spring on the hallman MBC cranked all the way up, my boost goes 16-17 on an uknown tune. im still waiting on the heavy spring that should handle more boost.
Trending Topics
#8
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think I saw somewhere that ER suggests the second method tapping directly off the turbo. I suppose that is what I should do considering they are going to tune my car. Maybe I will just have them install the thing.
#9
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lynnwood, Wa
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#2 is the 'proper' way to do it, you're wastegate controls you're boost levels, you want to manipulate the wastegate, not the BOV or intake manifold.
Using #2 lets the boost controller use a boost source going straight from where it's generated (compressor housing) to where it is regulated (wastegate), this is the best way. Use this.
Use #2 or die.
That is all.
Using #2 lets the boost controller use a boost source going straight from where it's generated (compressor housing) to where it is regulated (wastegate), this is the best way. Use this.
Use #2 or die.
That is all.
#12
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
You can if you want. I tried both and much preferred the 2nd method. Being tuned at around 25psi in the summer when winter came around and 20 degrees it would hit almost 29-30psi. The RX has the ceramic ball which isn't very friendly with the evo turbo as it spools too quickly, if you change it out for the steel ball essentially making it a regular Hallman it works better also (less boost oscillation).
Having said that I am an advocate of ECUboost (GM 3port). I basically got rid of my annoying spikes and it deviates less than 1psi all year round. I also hold almost 3psi more at redline per my Zeitronix logs. Just a thought...although not too many of the WA people have caught onto this, seems to be more of a Cali thing.
Having said that I am an advocate of ECUboost (GM 3port). I basically got rid of my annoying spikes and it deviates less than 1psi all year round. I also hold almost 3psi more at redline per my Zeitronix logs. Just a thought...although not too many of the WA people have caught onto this, seems to be more of a Cali thing.
#13
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Having said that I am an advocate of ECUboost (GM 3port). I basically got rid of my annoying spikes and it deviates less than 1psi all year round. I also hold almost 3psi more at redline per my Zeitronix logs. Just a thought...although not too many of the WA people have caught onto this, seems to be more of a Cali thing.
#14
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...id-vs-mbc.html
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...-over-mbc.html
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...ecu-boost.html
These are just a couple to look at. Pay attention to Razorlab (Bryan from GST) who has done alot of research on this and who tunes almost all his clients car like this. In a nut shell you get quicker spool, more consistency, and hold boost much better. My power up top held much better as did my torque curve. I hold over 21psi to 7500 instead of ~18.5psi with my Hallman.
If you visit the Ecuflash section you will find most the people much prefer that to a MBC. This also depends on who tunes your car though also as it takes more time to "adjust" as you are dealing with 3-4 separate tables within Ecuflash instead of just turning a knob. Once you figure it out it's pretty easy and their are alot of writeups on how to do this.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...-over-mbc.html
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...ecu-boost.html
These are just a couple to look at. Pay attention to Razorlab (Bryan from GST) who has done alot of research on this and who tunes almost all his clients car like this. In a nut shell you get quicker spool, more consistency, and hold boost much better. My power up top held much better as did my torque curve. I hold over 21psi to 7500 instead of ~18.5psi with my Hallman.
If you visit the Ecuflash section you will find most the people much prefer that to a MBC. This also depends on who tunes your car though also as it takes more time to "adjust" as you are dealing with 3-4 separate tables within Ecuflash instead of just turning a knob. Once you figure it out it's pretty easy and their are alot of writeups on how to do this.
#15
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...id-vs-mbc.html
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...-over-mbc.html
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...ecu-boost.html
These are just a couple to look at. Pay attention to Razorlab (Bryan from GST) who has done alot of research on this and who tunes almost all his clients car like this. In a nut shell you get quicker spool, more consistency, and hold boost much better. My power up top held much better as did my torque curve. I hold over 21psi to 7500 instead of ~18.5psi with my Hallman.
If you visit the Ecuflash section you will find most the people much prefer that to a MBC. This also depends on who tunes your car though also as it takes more time to "adjust" as you are dealing with 3-4 separate tables within Ecuflash instead of just turning a knob. Once you figure it out it's pretty easy and their are alot of writeups on how to do this.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...-over-mbc.html
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...ecu-boost.html
These are just a couple to look at. Pay attention to Razorlab (Bryan from GST) who has done alot of research on this and who tunes almost all his clients car like this. In a nut shell you get quicker spool, more consistency, and hold boost much better. My power up top held much better as did my torque curve. I hold over 21psi to 7500 instead of ~18.5psi with my Hallman.
If you visit the Ecuflash section you will find most the people much prefer that to a MBC. This also depends on who tunes your car though also as it takes more time to "adjust" as you are dealing with 3-4 separate tables within Ecuflash instead of just turning a knob. Once you figure it out it's pretty easy and their are alot of writeups on how to do this.
What does it cost to convert to a GM solenoid?