Virtual Dyno - Free -
Sep 7, 2011, 10:28 AM
#1
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Virtual Dyno - Free -
http://www.bradbarnhill.com/projects/VirtualDyno/
Download takes 2 seconds, feel free to donate if you want fellas.
Using Cobb AP, or Tactrix cable, do some logs, throw in your car into the Virtual dyno software, load up your datalog.csv files and it will show what hp/tq etc you run in comparison with everyone else using it.
for example
UR FMIC 4.5 inch
UR UICP
UR Resonated Test Pipe
Ams Widemouth DownPipe
Grimmspeed 3 port BCS
Tomei Ti-C cat back
Stock turbo on 94 oct
Car Weight 3500lbs driver 180
313/348 16 degrees celcius outside. UPDATE : 328/364 warmer temps overlayed
Download takes 2 seconds, feel free to donate if you want fellas.
Using Cobb AP, or Tactrix cable, do some logs, throw in your car into the Virtual dyno software, load up your datalog.csv files and it will show what hp/tq etc you run in comparison with everyone else using it.
for example
UR FMIC 4.5 inch
UR UICP
UR Resonated Test Pipe
Ams Widemouth DownPipe
Grimmspeed 3 port BCS
Tomei Ti-C cat back
Stock turbo on 94 oct
Car Weight 3500lbs driver 180
313/348 16 degrees celcius outside. UPDATE : 328/364 warmer temps overlayed
Last edited by Widoww; Sep 14, 2011 at 07:22 PM.
Sep 7, 2011, 03:12 PM
#4
I have to agree with Laksman. The boost graph looks terrible. Look at my Virtual dyno graph. I'm hitting 26psi tapering to 19psi.
Our cars have similar mods:
AMS downpipe
3" straight through exhaust
AEM intake
GS 3port
AGP intercooler
341WHP/350WTQ
Our cars have similar mods:
AMS downpipe
3" straight through exhaust
AEM intake
GS 3port
AGP intercooler
341WHP/350WTQ
Sep 7, 2011, 10:27 PM
#5
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stealthmr your weight is way off ...if I put down your weight I end up with 360whp 400+tq lol, your car weights 3600 
try that and edit ur post it'll change dramatically
try that and edit ur post it'll change dramatically
Sep 8, 2011, 06:00 AM
#6
I don't want to turn this into a pissing contest, but really is 100lbs difference going give your car an extra 40WHP/50WTQ.
Power numbers aside, I just want to point out that your tuner could have done a better job at tuning your boost levels.
Power numbers aside, I just want to point out that your tuner could have done a better job at tuning your boost levels.
Sep 8, 2011, 06:43 AM
#7
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah don't goto Neetronics! They are bad, this car has zero mivec tuning done.
Working on a new tune now, I just wanted to see everyones numbers and how it runs. Who tunes u
Working on a new tune now, I just wanted to see everyones numbers and how it runs. Who tunes u
Trending Topics
Sep 8, 2011, 09:29 AM
#8
I'm glad you posted your Virtual dyno graph.
A friend of mine was looking at getting his GSR tuned locally. I almost suggest Neetronics because Magnus was too expensive, but after looking at your results, I don't think that's a good idea.
My car was etuned by Clipse3GT, same guy that tuned Laksman car.
A friend of mine was looking at getting his GSR tuned locally. I almost suggest Neetronics because Magnus was too expensive, but after looking at your results, I don't think that's a good idea.
My car was etuned by Clipse3GT, same guy that tuned Laksman car.
Sep 11, 2011, 10:27 PM
#11
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
UPDATE top of thread i overlayed with old tune from neetronics and now from ams, still not fully tuned but very close
Last edited by Widoww; Sep 14, 2011 at 07:23 PM.
Sep 15, 2011, 09:57 AM
#13
Boost graph looks 10x better now.
Are you doing you logs in SSport mode? The reason I ask, is because I use to do my logs in Normal mode and would get massive torque spikes. I'm pretty sure it was because the SST clutches were slipping during initial boost . Using SSport mode, I notice the torque curve looked alot smoother.
Are you doing you logs in SSport mode? The reason I ask, is because I use to do my logs in Normal mode and would get massive torque spikes. I'm pretty sure it was because the SST clutches were slipping during initial boost . Using SSport mode, I notice the torque curve looked alot smoother.
Sep 17, 2011, 05:57 AM
#14
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sport asc off once,,was thinking super sport but to wait another 4 seconds every logg would suck I'll have to try it.
Your motor built right just seen ur vd graph 550dayum lolfp red gsc s2 same as me
Your motor built right just seen ur vd graph 550dayum lolfp red gsc s2 same as me
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RallySport Direct
EvoX 'For Sale' Exterior Styling
85
Aug 4, 2017 03:32 PM
sndm
04-06 Lancer Ralliart How To Requests / Questions / Tips
4
Jun 30, 2006 10:03 PM
