NEW RELEASE!! Precision Turbo Billet 5857 Turbo w/ PTE Cartridge!!!!
Apr 26, 2010 | 10:14 AM
#286
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (211)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
We have quite a few guys who love the quarter master on their daily.. I have never driven one myself other then my tilton carbon which was no issues other than rebuilding frequently for street duty..
Mike
Mike
Apr 26, 2010 | 10:19 AM
#287
They hold just fine yes but QM is TERRIBLE in traffic and need to rebuild after like 10-15k. there is just no reason to run a 7.25 clutch on the streets when you can just run a triple exedy and have perfect driveability and still hold the power.
Dont get me wrong tho. We have had both QM and Tilton on the track and NOTHING, shifts like they do
Dont get me wrong tho. We have had both QM and Tilton on the track and NOTHING, shifts like they do
Apr 26, 2010 | 06:27 PM
#288
Newbie
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, FL
The point of this car was not to show how much power can be made like every other jackass on here that only cares about peak whp. The point of this turbo was to show how soon a 2.0 could hit full boost on a T3 turbo that is "Rated" about the same as a 35R. it is kind of obvious that the car is capable on making 500hp easily on pump gas if hitting 25psi at 3800RPM and making 420whp on a mustang dyno without any tuning.
Next time we post ill be sure to tweak our dyno so we make 800hp with a setup only capable of 650 or so just to make you happy like alot of other people on here
Next time we post ill be sure to tweak our dyno so we make 800hp with a setup only capable of 650 or so just to make you happy like alot of other people on here
I didn't even see that with my .63 a/r GT3076r (saw 22psi at 4200rpm) and now with my 5857 (journal bearing) I see 22psi at 4600rpm and my car is also a 2 liter, not an Evo but still a 2 liter (83mm bore, 92.8mm stroke) and I am even using a log manifold which should spool sooner! I am seeing around 12* of timing in the 4000rpm range and peaking at around 18* after like 6500 or so running 93 and meth injection.
Last edited by A4 TSCHUSS; Apr 26, 2010 at 06:30 PM.
Apr 26, 2010 | 06:36 PM
#290
Apr 26, 2010 | 06:46 PM
#292
this particular car will be back very very soon(we hope this week) for final tuning. We already have a exedy twin sitting here waiting on the car to get back for install and tuning
Apr 26, 2010 | 07:05 PM
#294
this will help explain to some people.
http://cochise.uia.net/pkelley2/DynamicCR.html
http://cochise.uia.net/pkelley2/DynamicCR.html
Last edited by Force-Fed Performance; Apr 26, 2010 at 07:10 PM.
Apr 26, 2010 | 08:22 PM
#295
I think Mike knows the difference between the two...I'm pretty sure I explained it to him a few months ago.
He asked you a direct question and you dodged it. He asked you again and you hotlinked to someone else's site... as to insult his intelligence on the matter.
You sure know a lot about engines since you're having Dave build your engines for you huh?
He asked you a direct question and you dodged it. He asked you again and you hotlinked to someone else's site... as to insult his intelligence on the matter.
You sure know a lot about engines since you're having Dave build your engines for you huh?
Apr 26, 2010 | 08:40 PM
#297
Apr 26, 2010 | 08:55 PM
#299
thanks
Apr 26, 2010 | 08:56 PM
#300
Easy there. I'm as excited to see what this turbo does as you are. And really, that's the topic of discussion. The characteristics of the engine will play a roll in interpreting the results, but the difference between static and dynamic compression wouldn't cause enough of a discrepancy to skew the over all findings to the point where angry and sharp posts are justified. Ultimately everything force fed is doing is out of kindness. It would be nice to return the courtesy.