Full-Race Factory Turbo Manifold (PICS)
Dec 21, 2005, 06:34 PM
#122
it will be interesting to see the results, as these are two completely different manifold designs
RnR is a 4->1->2->1
Full Race is a 4->2->1
RnR uses a 1.61" diameter Primary
Full Race uses a smaller diameter Primary
Both have somewhat similar runner lengths and comparable merge collector entry angles.
Overall -- two totally different manifolds, should result in two totally different powerbands. Im very excited to see the results, it should answer a lot of questions in my mind.
edit: Out of curiosity, has there ever been a test of a cast unported manifold vs a cast ported manifold?
RnR is a 4->1->2->1
Full Race is a 4->2->1
RnR uses a 1.61" diameter Primary
Full Race uses a smaller diameter Primary
Both have somewhat similar runner lengths and comparable merge collector entry angles.
Overall -- two totally different manifolds, should result in two totally different powerbands. Im very excited to see the results, it should answer a lot of questions in my mind.
edit: Out of curiosity, has there ever been a test of a cast unported manifold vs a cast ported manifold?
Last edited by Geoff Raicer; Dec 21, 2005 at 06:38 PM.
Dec 21, 2005, 09:05 PM
#123
Originally Posted by Full-Race Geoff
Out of curiosity, has there ever been a test of a cast unported manifold vs a cast ported manifold?
He has not done a straight ported/non-ported exhaust mani only comparison though, I don't think.
Dec 21, 2005, 11:18 PM
#124
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Full-Race Geoff
i was looking at those ATP turbos, and I feel that anyone who has one, it would deifnately be in their best interest to get rid of that turbine housing, convert to a standard T3 housing, and use one of our T3 manifolds.
That turbine housing alone will cause significant restriction, later spool, increased pressure drop and turbulance in the volute as compared to a standard GT series tangential T3 turbine housing... definately not ideal
That turbine housing alone will cause significant restriction, later spool, increased pressure drop and turbulance in the volute as compared to a standard GT series tangential T3 turbine housing... definately not ideal
oic interesting. maybe that wont be a good idea then. maybe i'll just stick with a TME turbo then.
Dec 23, 2005, 09:05 AM
#126
Originally Posted by atlvalet
Kind of. Buschur did a comparo between a ported exhaust mani, turbo hotside and 02 housing versus stock non-ported. I think it was like 20 whp on a dynojet, IIRC.
Dec 23, 2005, 09:12 AM
#127
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Full-Race Geoff
which are you looking at?
i might just get ur Manifold with a TME 6.5 turbo. im looking for a street, auto-X, Road Track Setup. im done with HIGHWAY stuff, i did it with the civic and i would like to take advantage of the AWD!
Geoff u wanna PM with a setup u think would work nice?
Dec 23, 2005, 09:44 AM
#128
Originally Posted by Soon 2 B EVIL
i might just get ur Manifold with a TME 6.5 turbo. im looking for a street, auto-X, Road Track Setup. im done with HIGHWAY stuff, i did it with the civic and i would like to take advantage of the AWD!
Geoff u wanna PM with a setup u think would work nice?
Geoff u wanna PM with a setup u think would work nice?
right now there are a lot of turbos and manifolds with questionable gains. Wait it out, in a few weeks there will be a lot of questions answered.
Dec 29, 2005, 11:31 AM
#132
Originally Posted by Full-Race Geoff
not sure if you guys saw, but buschur did some interesting testing this past week
Geoff, are these things ready to go for purchase?
Dec 30, 2005, 03:02 PM
#134
Originally Posted by h22gordo
Saw the results! Great results!
Geoff, are these things ready to go for purchase?
Geoff, are these things ready to go for purchase?
