IveyLeagueTuning tuned EVO IX MR on the Mustang Dyno.
Dec 13, 2005, 07:02 AM
#31
Evolved Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Diamond Bar, California
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by manOfaith
just to stir the pot...if you really think 359 is close lets just say its only losing a very conservative 15% of a loss through the drivetrain. That would put the crank hp at 412 with just ex. and a good tune 
Dec 13, 2005, 07:03 AM
#32
Warrtalon there you go again with your stupid assumptions on my thread.
Somewhere in here before you proclaim one dyno molested and one not there has to be some sort of test between the two.
Do you know for a fact that the one I use has been molested? What are you using to judge this?
Man you are something else.
Sean
Somewhere in here before you proclaim one dyno molested and one not there has to be some sort of test between the two.
Do you know for a fact that the one I use has been molested? What are you using to judge this?
Man you are something else.
Sean
Last edited by Sean I; Dec 13, 2005 at 07:06 AM.
Dec 13, 2005, 07:10 AM
#33
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: ATX / Qatar
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All dynos can be manipulated, even the simplest dynojets. I'm interested to know what a stock IX dynos on that MD SeanI.
Before and after numbers = end of discussion.
Before and after numbers = end of discussion.
Dec 13, 2005, 07:16 AM
#37
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Flemington, NJ
Posts: 2,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sean I
Warrtalon there you go again with your stupid assumptions on my thread.
Somewhere in here before you proclaim one dyno molested and one not there has to be some sort of test between the two.
Do you know for a fact that the one I use has been molested? What are you using to judge this?
Man you are something else.
Sean
Somewhere in here before you proclaim one dyno molested and one not there has to be some sort of test between the two.
Do you know for a fact that the one I use has been molested? What are you using to judge this?
Man you are something else.
Sean
He thinks he's john force
Dec 13, 2005, 07:16 AM
#38
Originally Posted by Sean I
Warrtalon there you go again with your stupid assumptions on my thread.
Somewhere in here before you proclaim one dyno molested and one not there has to be some sort of test between the two.
Do you know for a fact that the one I use has been molested? What are you using to judge this?
Man you are something else.
Sean
Somewhere in here before you proclaim one dyno molested and one not there has to be some sort of test between the two.
Do you know for a fact that the one I use has been molested? What are you using to judge this?
Man you are something else.
Sean
Dec 13, 2005, 07:18 AM
#39
Originally Posted by Sean I
That was on the dynojet
Dec 13, 2005, 08:17 AM
#41
Originally Posted by Sean I
Warrtalon there you go again with your stupid assumptions on my thread.
Somewhere in here before you proclaim one dyno molested and one not there has to be some sort of test between the two.
Do you know for a fact that the one I use has been molested? What are you using to judge this?
Man you are something else.
Somewhere in here before you proclaim one dyno molested and one not there has to be some sort of test between the two.
Do you know for a fact that the one I use has been molested? What are you using to judge this?
Man you are something else.
And for the record, we've already dealt with this same issue several times, the most recent being the CFT dyno in Orlando. It's a Mustang Dyno, and people kept coming back from there with these incredibly lofty numbers and swearing that it had not been adjusted to read like a Dynojet. I was bashed by those locals for making "stupid assumptions" like you call them, even though they are based off common sense. Well, luckily, an objective source on a completely separate forum confirmed that people were dyno'ing the same numbers on their Dynojet as they had at the CFT Mustang Dyno. Until that was confirmed, people swore up and down that it had not been modified...and like you, people had asked the owner directly who had claimed that nothing had been changed. So, maybe this car does put down the equivalent of 390-400whp on a Dynojet with just pump gas and basic mods, but it's highly unlikely.
Last edited by Warrtalon; Dec 13, 2005 at 08:25 AM.
Dec 13, 2005, 08:19 AM
#42
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
something smells fishy. u know something is wrong when dave has this to say.
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
Needless to say a Mustand Dyno that has been manipulated. Check the roll weight as there isn't anyway possible the car would make that kind of power on our MD.
It's to the point now, and this is directed at you Sean as you don't own that dyno, that people use the MD to really brag about numbers as everyone knows how low mine is. The problem is half the MD owners I spoke with before buying mine told me to make sure I changed the calibrations or nobody would be happy with the numbers it gave them. Well, I didn't change mine.
On my dyno a good driver making 330 whp will run 11.30's at 124 mph. The numbers this particular dyno just spit out is telling us that with those minimal mods that car is going to break into the 10's at 127 mph. Yeah, right.
May as well refer to that particular MD as a Dynojet.
Very nice curve though which shows regardless of what the fake MD dyno is saying you did a good job on the tune.
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
It's to the point now, and this is directed at you Sean as you don't own that dyno, that people use the MD to really brag about numbers as everyone knows how low mine is. The problem is half the MD owners I spoke with before buying mine told me to make sure I changed the calibrations or nobody would be happy with the numbers it gave them. Well, I didn't change mine.
On my dyno a good driver making 330 whp will run 11.30's at 124 mph. The numbers this particular dyno just spit out is telling us that with those minimal mods that car is going to break into the 10's at 127 mph. Yeah, right.
May as well refer to that particular MD as a Dynojet.
Very nice curve though which shows regardless of what the fake MD dyno is saying you did a good job on the tune.
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Dec 13, 2005, 08:32 AM
#44
Originally Posted by deadbeatrec
something smells fishy. u know something is wrong when dave has this to say.
Sean, once again great tuning on your part. You have my business for sure.
Dec 13, 2005, 08:36 AM
#45
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The tune was good
The Curve was good
The Customer was happy
So why does it always have to flame fest on here?
Congrats Sean
There are more important things then to complain about dyno reading high. The only thing that really matters is weather the customer is happy. The Dyno is a tunning tool not the Bible of power.
Happy Holidays to All!!!!!!!!!!
The Curve was good
The Customer was happy
So why does it always have to flame fest on here?
Congrats Sean
There are more important things then to complain about dyno reading high. The only thing that really matters is weather the customer is happy. The Dyno is a tunning tool not the Bible of power.
Happy Holidays to All!!!!!!!!!!
Last edited by snoop; Dec 13, 2005 at 08:42 AM.