Pushing some new intake manifolds to the limit!

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Dec 12, 2007, 08:22 AM

#211

dafunk630

Evolved Member

iTrader: (10)

Join Date: Apr 2006

Location: USA

Posts: 1,447

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

^^^ thats sick!!!

Reply Like

Dec 12, 2007, 08:25 AM

#212

marksae

Evolved Member

iTrader: (12)

Join Date: Sep 2003

Location: SF, CA

Posts: 2,995

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Beautiful manifold! Awesome looking welds!

Reply Like

Dec 12, 2007, 08:56 AM

#213

kcevo

Evolved Member

iTrader: (11)

Join Date: Aug 2003

Location: Kansas City

Posts: 759

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Eric,

That's just sick....can't wait to see the resuls.

Reply Like

Dec 12, 2007, 09:12 AM

#214

AutoMotoSports

Former Sponsor

iTrader: (42)

Join Date: Oct 2003

Location: West Chicago, IL

Posts: 6,132

Likes: 0

Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Glad you like it Chad, she is a beauty!

Eric

Reply Like

Dec 12, 2007, 09:30 AM

#215

itzwolf

Evolved Member

iTrader: (9)

Join Date: Mar 2005

Location: Florida

Posts: 1,193

Likes: 0

Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Eric,

Can you give a comparison/breakdown to the current VSR? Specs etc... It definitely looks bigger, how about a side by side shot at the current and the new drag version?

Reply Like

Dec 12, 2007, 09:35 AM

#216

4G63DSM

Evolving Member

Join Date: Mar 2007

Location: In front of a Catia screen

Posts: 272

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeiPro

I would bet that the manifold with the best results will most likely have the largest plenum volume and the shortest runners.

Good Luck on the test, I am interested in the results!

Blanket statements like these make me a little wary... you can have runners that are too short and large, as well as a plenum volume much to great.......

throttle response anyone?

Reply Like

Dec 12, 2007, 09:26 PM

#217

wshihdnevo

Evolved Member

iTrader: (88)

Join Date: Dec 2006

Location: Tacoma

Posts: 2,765

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

That thing is freakishly HUGE! I love it!

And yes, that is what she said too...

Reply Like

Dec 16, 2007, 09:19 AM

#218

Paul Nelson

Evolved Member

Thread Starter

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: Jul 2005

Location: Team English Racing

Posts: 3,249

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by AutoMotoSports

Here is our new big boy drag version that we are sending paul for testing.

It should be in the mail today or tomorrow at the latest.

This version will be available to the public soon.

WOW! Cant wait!

Update

Waiting on the Full Race, Driven Innovation and Magnus i guess its stuck in Customs at the border.

Also we are putting in JE 10.1 pistons. I was having trouble with Arias so i went with the JE

Reply Like

Dec 16, 2007, 09:24 AM

#219

scorke

Evolved Member

iTrader: (18)

Join Date: May 2003

Location: Nj

Posts: 5,192

Likes: 1

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4G63DSM

Blanket statements like these make me a little wary... you can have runners that are too short and large, as well as a plenum volume much to great.......

throttle response anyone?

Throttle response on a 1000whp 2 liter 10,000 rpm drag evo? Are you kidding?

Scorke

Reply Like

Dec 16, 2007, 09:26 AM

#220

Paul Nelson

Evolved Member

Thread Starter

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: Jul 2005

Location: Team English Racing

Posts: 3,249

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by scorke

Throttle response on a 1000whp 2 liter 10,000 rpm drag evo? Are you kidding?

Scorke

We are going to be doing a 35r also. I wouldn't mind using the HTA 35r to test

Reply Like

Dec 16, 2007, 09:43 AM

#221

Sharkbite2000

Evolved Member

iTrader: (21)

Join Date: Dec 2005

Location: Eugene, Oregon

Posts: 4,898

Likes: 0

Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

That AMS MANI looks sick, it's gonna take alot to sink that battleship

Reply Like

Dec 16, 2007, 10:26 AM

#222

andyktlee

Pocket Mo

iTrader: (8)

Join Date: Sep 2006

Location: Washington

Posts: 588

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Holy sick looking manifolds Batman! Anxiously awaiting the results of this test to see which one I'll be going with for my TS GT4088R turbo.

Thanks Paul!

Reply Like

Dec 16, 2007, 11:09 AM

#223

Max Power

Evolving Member

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: Aug 2005

Location: Chandler, AZ

Posts: 318

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Wow, all of those manifolds with a 42r and 35r turbo? That's a ton of work - thanks a bunch for doing all of that testing.

Reply Like

Dec 16, 2007, 11:27 AM

#224

tabio42

Evolving Member

iTrader: (15)

Join Date: Sep 2004

Posts: 443

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Holy crap that AMS manifold has a lot of welds. Don't let your welder work when he's sleepy

Reply Like

Dec 16, 2007, 04:39 PM

#225

DeiPro

Account Disabled

Join Date: Nov 2006

Location: Akron, Ohio

Posts: 174

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4G63DSM

Blanket statements like these make me a little wary... you can have runners that are too short and large, as well as a plenum volume much to great.......

throttle response anyone?

I dont think he is worrying about throttle response my friend...

You right about the general statement though. But of the manifolds presented to be tested, I hold to my statement. I have 2 excel spreadsheets that I developed that calculate all the RPMs corresponding to runner length and diameter using a Hemholtz resonance model and inertial effects. I have quite enough experience with manifold design.

Reply Like