562 whp, 404 ft lbs, 93 octane, 2 liter engine.
#65
Evolved Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i dont get why people are still using the 37r over the 35r or HTA35, heaps more lag and not much more power. I doubt its a cost thing, as you need to spend a heap of cash to get a setup like this, so why try save a few $ where its best not to skimp.
#67
As far as turbos go. I don't know if the HTA88 would make more power, I have to assume yes.
I agree, HTA35r would have been my choice on this car with the 2 liter, much better midrange.
The HTA88/67 ptrim turbos work very very well on the 2.3 liter engines.
Ultimate though would be the 2.3 with an HTA35r, spool up would be stellar but in order to use it to it's full potential a taller gear would need to be used.
I agree, HTA35r would have been my choice on this car with the 2 liter, much better midrange.
The HTA88/67 ptrim turbos work very very well on the 2.3 liter engines.
Ultimate though would be the 2.3 with an HTA35r, spool up would be stellar but in order to use it to it's full potential a taller gear would need to be used.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
David Buschur
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
53
Mar 6, 2009 07:30 AM
David Buschur
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
302
Aug 2, 2008 03:28 AM
David Buschur
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
40
Jun 2, 2008 12:37 PM
David Buschur
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
159
Apr 16, 2008 08:06 AM
David Buschur
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
187
Mar 23, 2008 05:06 PM