HTA35r New Dyno #'s w/ Meth @ The Shop
Aug 27, 2008, 07:26 AM
#17
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow, good ****! You dont always see that sort of improvement jumping up from 63 to 82 A/R, but at the higher boost levels it is something to keep in mind for sure.
Nice car and nice tuning work, that tuneup is crisp and clean like 7-up!
Nice car and nice tuning work, that tuneup is crisp and clean like 7-up!
Aug 27, 2008, 09:26 AM
#19
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I cant wait for my HTA 35r!
How readily available is Junior? Im trying to get tuned by him but he always seems absent??
Dan
Congrats on the numbers!
How readily available is Junior? Im trying to get tuned by him but he always seems absent??
Dan
Congrats on the numbers!
Aug 27, 2008, 09:51 AM
#20
I would not be jumping to conclusions about the exhaust housing as being the sole reason for the big improvement seen here. I have seen the RNR kit and it is poorly designed. The worst part was the 02 housing design. The header in this kit places the turbo too close to alternator. so when they made the 02 they had to use 2.25 tubing and a very sharp turn to get it to clear the alternator. The 02 housing was the reason the setup was seeing excessive back pressure. Not the precision .63. I use the precision .63 on my car. Breathing through a stock intake mani, cast exhaust mani, and proper 3 inch 02 it layed down 620/567 on reg 35r. 93 octane with meth. It was poised to make more but I was out of fuel.
Also keep in mind these dyno numbers from this dyno do not read low. they look like they read higher than a dynojet. performance form green proves that.
FP Green: 487 whp/510 trq = 11.2 @123 (1.78 60ft) (98mph 1/8)
thats a very weak track time for those numbers. 380whp on Buschur dyno will get those track times.
I would say congratulations on finding the restriction in your setup. 2.25 02 with sharp turn has no business on 35r setup.
Also keep in mind these dyno numbers from this dyno do not read low. they look like they read higher than a dynojet. performance form green proves that.
FP Green: 487 whp/510 trq = 11.2 @123 (1.78 60ft) (98mph 1/8)
thats a very weak track time for those numbers. 380whp on Buschur dyno will get those track times.
I would say congratulations on finding the restriction in your setup. 2.25 02 with sharp turn has no business on 35r setup.
Last edited by 94AWDcoupe; Aug 27, 2008 at 09:56 AM.
Aug 27, 2008, 02:07 PM
#22
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would not be jumping to conclusions about the exhaust housing as being the sole reason for the big improvement seen here. I have seen the RNR kit and it is poorly designed. The worst part was the 02 housing design. The header in this kit places the turbo too close to alternator. so when they made the 02 they had to use 2.25 tubing and a very sharp turn to get it to clear the alternator. The 02 housing was the reason the setup was seeing excessive back pressure. Not the precision .63. I use the precision .63 on my car. Breathing through a stock intake mani, cast exhaust mani, and proper 3 inch 02 it layed down 620/567 on reg 35r. 93 octane with meth. It was poised to make more but I was out of fuel.
Also keep in mind these dyno numbers from this dyno do not read low. they look like they read higher than a dynojet. performance form green proves that.
FP Green: 487 whp/510 trq = 11.2 @123 (1.78 60ft) (98mph 1/8)
thats a very weak track time for those numbers. 380whp on Buschur dyno will get those track times.
I would say congratulations on finding the restriction in your setup. 2.25 02 with sharp turn has no business on 35r setup.
Also keep in mind these dyno numbers from this dyno do not read low. they look like they read higher than a dynojet. performance form green proves that.
FP Green: 487 whp/510 trq = 11.2 @123 (1.78 60ft) (98mph 1/8)
thats a very weak track time for those numbers. 380whp on Buschur dyno will get those track times.
I would say congratulations on finding the restriction in your setup. 2.25 02 with sharp turn has no business on 35r setup.
Not going against you or anything, but do you have solid proof and justification that the cause of the big HP loss is through a bend right after the turbo? How would you say that it can affect hp THAT much?
Dan
Aug 28, 2008, 03:48 PM
#23
many have made good numbers (620-650) on the precision .63. The housing only making 530 in the previous setup shows there was something else wrong.
if there is gains from the .82 it is likely in the 20-30hp range, not 100 like this poster suggests.
Last edited by 94AWDcoupe; Aug 28, 2008 at 03:53 PM.
Aug 28, 2008, 07:14 PM
#24
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Harpers Ferry,WV
Posts: 751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
An Ebay o2 is larger then 2 1/4. I would have to say 60% of the gains are from the 3/4of an inch enlargment of the 02 housing.
Im glad to see that both were opened up at the same time to get the max potential from that set up.
Im glad to see that both were opened up at the same time to get the max potential from that set up.
Sep 3, 2008, 08:59 PM
#27
Evolving Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Into the 10s she went. I didn't raise the limiter enough though and she was on it @ the 1000ft... We didn't get a ticket... but it must have been bad.. lol.. because they wouldn't even give us the 1/8th mph... Still trapped 133.. My guess is 106-110@1/8
Sep 4, 2008, 07:00 AM
#29
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Edison
Posts: 2,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would not be jumping to conclusions about the exhaust housing as being the sole reason for the big improvement seen here. I have seen the RNR kit and it is poorly designed. The worst part was the 02 housing design. The header in this kit places the turbo too close to alternator. so when they made the 02 they had to use 2.25 tubing and a very sharp turn to get it to clear the alternator.
You mean the AC compresor correct? Keith
Sep 4, 2008, 07:55 AM
#30
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Was this 10sec run on meth or straight pump? So it picked up 1 mph with 40-50whp more? Im guessing he was banging off the limiter in the end?
Congrats!
Dan
Congrats!
Dan