Notices
Vendor Service / Parts / Tuning Review Post your service, part & tuning reviews here. Please note all new threads are moderated.

Wilson V2 - FP Green results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 21, 2008, 09:51 AM
  #16  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
LilRico's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cut throat, Orlando
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is this on pump gas?
Old Oct 21, 2008, 10:14 AM
  #17  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (8)
 
RazorLab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mid-Hudson, NY
Posts: 14,071
Received 1,056 Likes on 764 Posts
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
Peak to peak boost was 27.7psi to 27.2psi. Negligible IMO.
Not peak boost, I meant, at the area where there was peak horsepower loss, was the boost at that point the same with both?

Do you have a boost curve overlay? You mentioned something about boost dropping off up top?
Old Oct 21, 2008, 10:22 AM
  #18  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (161)
 
Aby@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Elijo Hills, Ca.
Posts: 3,043
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
What were the dates of the dyno runs & what is the zipcode of dyno location?

just willing to look into ambient condition changes from run to run.
Old Oct 21, 2008, 10:37 AM
  #19  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
TTP Engineering's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Central FL
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Dynosheet Coming.
Old Oct 21, 2008, 10:43 AM
  #20  
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
scheides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
5500rpms, how can boost be up, torque be up, but power be down? That makes no sense.
Old Oct 21, 2008, 11:01 AM
  #21  
Account Disabled
 
Shacochis06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bel Air, MD
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lets see the graph
Old Oct 21, 2008, 06:46 PM
  #22  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
vwjeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Las Vegas and HATING it
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Is it possible that because TTP is known for high reading numbers, that now the dyno is reading "correctly" this is the reason for drop in HP, now the roll weight is correct?
Old Oct 21, 2008, 07:20 PM
  #23  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
black_evo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by vwjeff
Is it possible that because TTP is known for high reading numbers, that now the dyno is reading "correctly" this is the reason for drop in HP, now the roll weight is correct?
What do you mean the dyno now reads "correctly"? Am I missing something....?
Old Oct 21, 2008, 07:49 PM
  #24  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Ph3n1x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: ¯\(º_o)/¯
Posts: 2,251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by black_evo
What do you mean the dyno now reads "correctly"? Am I missing something....?
Just misinformation thats all. Lets not turn this thread into a dyno competition again.
Old Oct 21, 2008, 08:05 PM
  #25  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
TTP Engineering's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Central FL
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by vwjeff
Is it possible that because TTP is known for high reading numbers, that now the dyno is reading "correctly" this is the reason for drop in HP, now the roll weight is correct?
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. No adjustments have been made to the dyno since three engineers from Mustang Dyno set it up when it was brand new.

Not sure why you would want to spread lies amongst the forum?

Last edited by TTP Engineering; Oct 21, 2008 at 08:10 PM.
Old Oct 21, 2008, 08:06 PM
  #26  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
TTP Engineering's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Central FL
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Last edited by TTP Engineering; Oct 21, 2008 at 08:08 PM.
Old Oct 21, 2008, 08:06 PM
  #27  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (211)
 
AWD Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: South Florida
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by vwjeff
Is it possible that because TTP is known for high reading numbers, that now the dyno is reading "correctly" this is the reason for drop in HP, now the roll weight is correct?

I guess that could be possible.. Id like to get to the bottom of Ozzies issue.. there is no reason that manifold should lose power regardless of the turbo size.. Indy is in agreement with that as well.. I have a customer with a green that Jestr tunes.. i am going to see if i can borrow his car for a before and after.. he also has the BR stock ported.. Then we can do an accurate before and after back to back on the dyno and see if the data is correct..

Mike

Last edited by AWD Motorsports; Oct 21, 2008 at 08:09 PM.
Old Oct 21, 2008, 08:09 PM
  #28  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
06MREvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 4,800
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
dyno sheets??
Old Oct 21, 2008, 08:13 PM
  #29  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (211)
 
AWD Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: South Florida
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There was a different graph up there before it got changed at 11:08.. What graph was that scott???
Old Oct 21, 2008, 08:14 PM
  #30  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
06MREvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 4,800
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
haha crap...when i just looked at this thread like 2 mins ago i swear there was no dyno sheet there..sorry...


Quick Reply: Wilson V2 - FP Green results



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:04 PM.