MAP SST (Sleeper Series Turbo) Installed and tested
#421
Then why are you cluttering it; Dynojet dynos read 14-18% higher than mustang or dyno dynamics dynos dude 430whp on these is around 500 on a dynojet. If people would keep that in mind, maybe more people would have been more impressed with my 432whp dyno dynamics BBK and the one Bryan posted that's like 440, just way more powerful than people think.
The car that made 490whp with the SST on MAP's dynojet made 414whp on a dyno dynamics this spring (Bill@MAP).
The car that made 490whp with the SST on MAP's dynojet made 414whp on a dyno dynamics this spring (Bill@MAP).
Correction. Bills car was on a ~460whp tune when it went up there.
#423
The turbo was just ported and coated since this test it might have a little more left in it according to the road testing and logging ive done sadly i dought i will have it back on a dyno soon
#424
Then why are you cluttering it; Dynojet dynos read 14-18% higher than mustang or dyno dynamics dynos dude 430whp on these is around 500 on a dynojet. If people would keep that in mind, maybe more people would have been more impressed with my 432whp dyno dynamics BBK and the one Bryan posted that's like 440, just way more powerful than people think.
The car that made 490whp with the SST on MAP's dynojet made 414whp on a dyno dynamics this spring (Bill@MAP).
The car that made 490whp with the SST on MAP's dynojet made 414whp on a dyno dynamics this spring (Bill@MAP).
#428
#431
I'm gonna get tuned on 93 octane for now. I'll eventually get an additional tune for E85 later but things are too tight for that at the moment.
I'll also be attending a Dyno Day with a diffrent dyno to compare #s. One is a Dynojet & the other is a Dyno Dynamics (heartbreaker). I was perviously putting down 349 on a DYno Dynamics with full bolt ons & cams, stock turbo. So It will be interesting to see how it compares to the 2.3 build with ported head, intake, & SST.
I'll also be attending a Dyno Day with a diffrent dyno to compare #s. One is a Dynojet & the other is a Dyno Dynamics (heartbreaker). I was perviously putting down 349 on a DYno Dynamics with full bolt ons & cams, stock turbo. So It will be interesting to see how it compares to the 2.3 build with ported head, intake, & SST.
#433
I want a XL! I would have bought the SST if I would have seen results for it on E85. Now theres more choices like the black and the XL. Too much sleepin on this turbo while others are making moves!
#434
I'm gonna get tuned on 93 octane for now. I'll eventually get an additional tune for E85 later but things are too tight for that at the moment.
I'll also be attending a Dyno Day with a diffrent dyno to compare #s. One is a Dynojet & the other is a Dyno Dynamics (heartbreaker). I was perviously putting down 349 on a DYno Dynamics with full bolt ons & cams, stock turbo. So It will be interesting to see how it compares to the 2.3 build with ported head, intake, & SST.
I'll also be attending a Dyno Day with a diffrent dyno to compare #s. One is a Dynojet & the other is a Dyno Dynamics (heartbreaker). I was perviously putting down 349 on a DYno Dynamics with full bolt ons & cams, stock turbo. So It will be interesting to see how it compares to the 2.3 build with ported head, intake, & SST.