300whp on Dyno Dynamics 93 octane
Oct 6, 2004, 07:28 PM
#31
Evolved Member
iTrader: (70)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: La Isla Del Encanto
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Noize
Simple: Idle quality and the fact that output differences in the different HKS cam combos is slightly noticable, but still pretty negligable.
Did you retard the cam gears any?
Oct 6, 2004, 07:49 PM
#32
Evolved Member
iTrader: (43)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
straight 272's isn't even that bad at all as far as idle and you get way more power, personally I don't know why you'd want straight 264's... waste of money IMO
Oct 6, 2004, 08:08 PM
#33
Evolved Member
iTrader: (70)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: La Isla Del Encanto
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RenoEvo
straight 272's isn't even that bad at all as far as idle and you get way more power, personally I don't know why you'd want straight 264's... waste of money IMO
Oct 7, 2004, 05:29 AM
#34
Originally Posted by RenoEvo
straight 272's isn't even that bad at all as far as idle and you get way more power, personally I don't know why you'd want straight 264's... waste of money IMO
Either you are wrong or the dyno is. I think I'll believe what the dyno says in this instance. The lift on them is identical, the only difference is 8 degrees of duration. The output variance is extremely small.VTECh8tr- My gears are at -3/-2.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
