What is the difference between the HFS-1 and the HKS-5?
#16
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (56)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i'd like to add this to this discussion. this is from my experience installing dozens of these kits on evos with all sorts of turbo setups from stock, 50 trim, green, 30r, 35r, etc.
for most people, the issue is cost. the HFS1 is considerably cheaper the the HFS5 and that alone is a deciding factor for people.
beyond the issue of the cost of the kit, here is how i recommend the kits to people. if you are building the car to do any road racing, drivers ed, (i'd say autocross, but meth injection is illegal in all classes), rally or spirited driving where part throttle conditions are seen often, and how the car operates in those transient conditions is critical, then without a doubt the HFS5 is the kit you will want. if you are only looking to do drag racing/street racing with the car, and the car will primarily see only WOT runs, then the HFS1 is going to better suit you.
the reasoning behind this is, the HFS5 has a fuel injector amplifier which allows the high speed valve to control the meth flow rate based off the ecus IDC of the primary injectors. what this will do is keep the meth delivery more consistent with what load cell you are in on the fuel tables. more consistency means a smoother tune and more consistent AFR in transient conditions when your feathering the throttle around the apex of a turn, or gently rolling onto the throttle of an increasing radius turn. with the HFS5 you have to watch out for a few things though. one is because it follows IDC, you need to pick your primary injectors so that they use as much duty cycle as possible. if you are only reaching 50-60% duty cycle at WOT then you are not going to get the full advantage of the high speed valve. however if you are hitting 85-90% duty cycle, then the methanol will give a wide range of flow rates and give the very consistent AFR through the load cells and RPM ranges.
if the car is only going to see WOT runs, or the transient conditions are not as important, then the HFS1 is better suited. because there is only one flow rate for the HFS1 once it is setup, you will see a transition point in the fuel tables where the meth turns on. and you will always have either a semi lean or semi rich point at that transition point. generally, good tuning can work most of this out, but you can still see the transition visibly on a wideband log. think of it this way, if the kit it set to turn on around 15psi, at 15 psi you will see 1000cc/min of methanol, and at 30psi, you'll still have 1000cc/min of methanol. at 14 psi you will have 0cc/min of methanol. you can see the discontinuity (note* the kits are usually triggered off of IDC, not MAP, but MAP and Injector pulse width do follow very close. IDC will follow close at spoolup and increase as RPM increases). this kit is not Dependant on the size of your primary injectors either... if you run 880s or 550's it will still deliver the same amount of methanol. that is an advantage to this kit.
the price difference is about 250 dollars too, thats why many other aquamist dealers recommend the HFS1, less setup dependancy, and slightly easier install.
for most people, the issue is cost. the HFS1 is considerably cheaper the the HFS5 and that alone is a deciding factor for people.
beyond the issue of the cost of the kit, here is how i recommend the kits to people. if you are building the car to do any road racing, drivers ed, (i'd say autocross, but meth injection is illegal in all classes), rally or spirited driving where part throttle conditions are seen often, and how the car operates in those transient conditions is critical, then without a doubt the HFS5 is the kit you will want. if you are only looking to do drag racing/street racing with the car, and the car will primarily see only WOT runs, then the HFS1 is going to better suit you.
the reasoning behind this is, the HFS5 has a fuel injector amplifier which allows the high speed valve to control the meth flow rate based off the ecus IDC of the primary injectors. what this will do is keep the meth delivery more consistent with what load cell you are in on the fuel tables. more consistency means a smoother tune and more consistent AFR in transient conditions when your feathering the throttle around the apex of a turn, or gently rolling onto the throttle of an increasing radius turn. with the HFS5 you have to watch out for a few things though. one is because it follows IDC, you need to pick your primary injectors so that they use as much duty cycle as possible. if you are only reaching 50-60% duty cycle at WOT then you are not going to get the full advantage of the high speed valve. however if you are hitting 85-90% duty cycle, then the methanol will give a wide range of flow rates and give the very consistent AFR through the load cells and RPM ranges.
if the car is only going to see WOT runs, or the transient conditions are not as important, then the HFS1 is better suited. because there is only one flow rate for the HFS1 once it is setup, you will see a transition point in the fuel tables where the meth turns on. and you will always have either a semi lean or semi rich point at that transition point. generally, good tuning can work most of this out, but you can still see the transition visibly on a wideband log. think of it this way, if the kit it set to turn on around 15psi, at 15 psi you will see 1000cc/min of methanol, and at 30psi, you'll still have 1000cc/min of methanol. at 14 psi you will have 0cc/min of methanol. you can see the discontinuity (note* the kits are usually triggered off of IDC, not MAP, but MAP and Injector pulse width do follow very close. IDC will follow close at spoolup and increase as RPM increases). this kit is not Dependant on the size of your primary injectors either... if you run 880s or 550's it will still deliver the same amount of methanol. that is an advantage to this kit.
the price difference is about 250 dollars too, thats why many other aquamist dealers recommend the HFS1, less setup dependancy, and slightly easier install.
#18
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Alpharetta GA
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanx KevinD. That's the best explanation I've read. Looks like the HFC-5 is for me. I plan to do a hand full of track days & have been debating getting a meth kit. I think I'll be getting one of these soon.
#21
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: England
Posts: 2,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Parts needed to upgrade HFS-1 to HFS-5:
1) FIA2 fuel injection amplifier (806-441)
2) High speed Valve (806-244) + fittings and clips.
3) 22cc surge arrestor/accumulator (806-409)
4) 5-port manifold (--)
5) 75mm SS worm drive clip (--)
6) 22cc accumulator support bracket (--)
7) 1/8 BSPM to 3/8BSPM adaptor (--)
8) 2x BSP blanking plugs.
9) 1 set of inline restrictor pills (--)
10) HFS-5 user manual (--)
Upgrade kit available direct from Aquamist UK only.
1) FIA2 fuel injection amplifier (806-441)
2) High speed Valve (806-244) + fittings and clips.
3) 22cc surge arrestor/accumulator (806-409)
4) 5-port manifold (--)
5) 75mm SS worm drive clip (--)
6) 22cc accumulator support bracket (--)
7) 1/8 BSPM to 3/8BSPM adaptor (--)
8) 2x BSP blanking plugs.
9) 1 set of inline restrictor pills (--)
10) HFS-5 user manual (--)
Upgrade kit available direct from Aquamist UK only.
Last edited by Richard L; May 15, 2008 at 01:37 PM.
#22
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I prefer the HFS 1 for cars with stock turbos
Since the boost response on those applications spikes high at low rpms and then tapers down towards red line a IDC progressive kit in many cases gives a inverse supply of the alcohol which is actually needed
Cars with too small an injector using alcohol to compensate of cars with large turbos which hold full boost at high rpms work better with the HFS 5
Al
Since the boost response on those applications spikes high at low rpms and then tapers down towards red line a IDC progressive kit in many cases gives a inverse supply of the alcohol which is actually needed
Cars with too small an injector using alcohol to compensate of cars with large turbos which hold full boost at high rpms work better with the HFS 5
Al
#23
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
of course with several nozzels the transition can become more difficult to feather
As I said above on stock turbo cars the HFS 1 is my choice 100%
On my STI which has run out of injector at high rpms I use the HFS 5 as high rpms fuelling is needed
The selction of the kit is needs to be made based upon the nature of the car's modification and the reasons why the customer is running an alcohol injection system
Al
#24
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Alpharetta GA
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Al, do you still recomend the HSF-1 for road course cars with stock turbo? What about the green? I guess I should give you an idea of what I plan to do with my car. Right now it is a full bolt on IX with 272's. I plan to go green-meth-AEM EMS in the future & not necessarily in that order. I drive the car when not going to & from work, so it's kind of a daily driver. I plan to do track days & a couple trips to the strip with it, but street driveability is a must. Any recomendations will help my future meth plans. I'll be doing Aquamist for sure, but now the question is which one. Price is not an issue, cause I'd rather hold out longer to get the right one for my needs.
#25
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Augusta, GA
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Al, do you still recomend the HSF-1 for road course cars with stock turbo? What about the green? I guess I should give you an idea of what I plan to do with my car. Right now it is a full bolt on IX with 272's. I plan to go green-meth-AEM EMS in the future & not necessarily in that order. I drive the car when not going to & from work, so it's kind of a daily driver. I plan to do track days & a couple trips to the strip with it, but street driveability is a must. Any recomendations will help my future meth plans. I'll be doing Aquamist for sure, but now the question is which one. Price is not an issue, cause I'd rather hold out longer to get the right one for my needs.
Want meth to replace race gas for more boost and drag strip trips.
green/780cc/cams/bolt ons.
#26
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: warner robins georgia
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah im in the same boat as my other 2 georgia boys. I am more than likely going to go with green aem and meth or maybe a 50trim. I dont do autocross or anything. I will go to the drag strip just once prolly to see what time i can put up. I will be doing spirited weekend drives around town. What do you guys suggest for me?
#27
Evolving Member
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: SDeezie
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
with a stock turbo on meth hfs1 will bigger injectors be necessary? i know once i upgrade to the green i will need injectors but unsure if i will need it for just the meth on stock turbo??
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nybluelancer
Lancer Audio and Security (All models)
1
Jul 10, 2017 09:48 AM
IRISHEVOX
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
12
Jan 9, 2014 04:15 PM
speedster07
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules
3
Apr 23, 2013 08:25 PM