Notices
Water / Methanol Injection / Nitrous Oxide

air fuel ratios and meth

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 15, 2008, 09:40 PM
  #76  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
dudical26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NNJ
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is so much theory to go back and forth on the issue so many different ways.
Some say leaner is better and others say richer is better. And there is theory to support both ideas.

Does anyone have real world experience? It would be great to hear from someone who has tried both and seen what works, other than the DLL graph already posted.
Old Jan 15, 2008, 11:28 PM
  #77  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
JeffMas1587's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Fort Worth/Denver
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
this is why i let kevinD tune my car.
Old Jan 16, 2008, 02:29 AM
  #78  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
SlowCar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Posts: 3,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dubbleugly01
lamba = actual AFR/ideal AFR.

For instance, an 12.5 actual AFR/14.7 ideal AFR = a lamba of .85.

slowcar, yes meth is less viscous and has a lower surface tension than water. Good lord I didn't calculate it! I just looked it up in a reference book . I haven't had to do a calculation in quite some time! But the point is, meth flows BETTER than water. We all know how hard it is to get a meth leak to stop, the stuff flows that well!


Old Jan 16, 2008, 02:36 AM
  #79  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
SlowCar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Posts: 3,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dudical26
There is so much theory to go back and forth on the issue so many different ways.
Some say leaner is better and others say richer is better. And there is theory to support both ideas.

Does anyone have real world experience? It would be great to hear from someone who has tried both and seen what works, other than the DLL graph already posted.
on my car, meth = 2 x 1.0mm nozzle using the HFS-1, the car just would not run...it would misfire so bad on the dyno, it was puffing black ***** of smoke w/ afr in the mid 11s

leaning it out to >12.0, misfire stop and we gained ~30hp

KevinD tuning on a dynodynamics
Old Jan 16, 2008, 05:49 AM
  #80  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
bigric09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Spec-Ops Motorsports, Fayetteville, NC
Posts: 3,146
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by dudical26
Does anyone have real world experience? It would be great to hear from someone who has tried both and seen what works, other than the DLL graph already posted.
actually... during my tune on my car i got to experiment a little bit with it. Using 11.5 AFR's i hit probably 480whp... i dropped her down to 11.1, added a bit of timing and that is when i hit 499. So, with my 50/50 heet/distilled mix... 11.0 to 11.1 seems to yield me better power up top. Torque was better though with the 11.5 AFR. I was rushed off of the dyno though so i have some more work to do with the car. Right now i just finally got to take off the measily 3" intake and get the 4" on so im sure im getting air in the car with a little more volume or at least with less work. We are in the process of fabbing a new intake box for the car to keep intake air temps down some. I understand the meth is cooling the charge, but i have a big hole in the bay over there so why not fill it .... im sure the cool air will help as well
Old Jan 16, 2008, 08:18 AM
  #81  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Mad_SB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From what I have seen so far on my car and others....

If your ignition cannot handle the meth/water and starts to breakup at "rich" afr's then you would want to lean it out. If however the ignition can handle the "rich" afr's then you can pickup power by going 11:1 or richer.

This does however assume you are spraying a lot of meth, like at least 25% meth to fuel. AND you are not using a lot of water in the mix. The more fuel you replace with meth the richer you want to run.

At lower injection quantities, you are mainly using the meth as a cooling agent and not a fuel so keeping the afr's on the lean side should result in more power.

With 50/50 or 100% H20 at low quantities (10% WAI to fuel) you would want to take advantage of the water and tune for a lean afr (12.0:1 to 12.5:1).


When I did my 100% water tune (single .8mm jet at 80% duty cycle) I got best results by tuning at 12.1:1.

When I did 50/50 I got best results with a single 1.0mm jet at about 11.8:1.

When I did 75% meth 25%water I used a .8mm and a 1.0mm and tuned to 11.5:1

100% I will use the same jets (.8 and 1.0) and drop the afr to 11 or 10.5.

We just did a 2.3 hta 35r car this past weekend. It made 420whp (our dynodynamics reads lowwwwwwwwww) on 93 at 21psi. I tuned it at 10:1 with 1000cc/min meth and it put down 520 whp at 30psi. There was still more room for boost, could have gone up another pound or two, but the owner is going to be beating on it a lot so I left it conservative.

Next time out I will try keeping it lean at peak torque and letting the afr tapper rich as the revs climb to see if we can get the best of both worlds.

Last edited by Mad_SB; Jan 16, 2008 at 08:20 AM.
Old Jan 16, 2008, 08:23 AM
  #82  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (19)
 
steadly2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lincolnton, NC
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With ratings like 1000cc/min, at what pressure is that measured?
Old Jan 16, 2008, 08:48 AM
  #83  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Mad_SB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by steadly2004
With ratings like 1000cc/min, at what pressure is that measured?
This was an older snow stg2 with a new labontee failsafe box and solenoid valve. Used two snow jets (375 and 625) so I would assume that snow jets are rated at the max output of the snow pump.
Old Jan 16, 2008, 11:13 AM
  #84  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
ChuckP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by mad_VIII

With 50/50 or 100% H20 at low quantities (10% WAI to fuel) you would want to take advantage of the water and tune for a lean afr (12.0:1 to 12.5:1).

When I did 50/50 I got best results with a single 1.0mm jet at about 11.8:1.
.
So im asuming 11.8:1AFR worked better than a leaner 12-12.5:1? Was this with stock turbo or your green?
Old Jan 16, 2008, 11:22 AM
  #85  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Mad_SB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ChuckP
So im asuming 11.8:1AFR worked better than a leaner 12-12.5:1? Was this with stock turbo or your green?
Yes, with the green.

It all depends on how much and what you are injecting, if your ignition can handle it, what you are using to tune with, and what your car likes.
Old Jan 16, 2008, 01:56 PM
  #86  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
ChuckP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by mad_VIII
Yes, with the green.

It all depends on how much and what you are injecting, if your ignition can handle it, what you are using to tune with, and what your car likes.
What do you reccomend for a stock IX turbo and 50/50 mix? HFS-1 setup.
.8mm nozle? what AFR? on 91oct

Would you go 1 step colder plugs with stock turbo and 50/50 meth?

Last edited by ChuckP; Jan 16, 2008 at 02:09 PM.
Old Jan 16, 2008, 05:22 PM
  #87  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
bnice01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hurlburt Field, FL
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dudical26
There is so much theory to go back and forth on the issue so many different ways.
Some say leaner is better and others say richer is better. And there is theory to support both ideas.

Does anyone have real world experience? It would be great to hear from someone who has tried both and seen what works, other than the DLL graph already posted.

I couldnt agree more LOL, wow the past few days with all these formulas seems kinda useless because both do make great power. Its all in what the person wants.

x2 on what big ric said I can say from first hand experience when tuning a friends car the leaner mixture peak tq hit pretty hard but good topend. the richer mixture with more timing pull like a mad man uptop but a little soft with the initial punch.
Old Jan 17, 2008, 06:07 PM
  #88  
Evolved Member
 
crcain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
mad_vii

thanks very much for helping us out. will be tuning for meth for the first soon with my buddy and we have been having fun discussing this stuff but more than anything hearing from people doing it is huge... so thanks.

it was asserted as a fact earlier in this thread that meth wants a lower lambda technically than gasoline for max power. so wanting to run a lower lambda the more you use meth as a fuel makes sense.

Just doing some googling... the below link asserts best power for methanol is 5:1 while gasoline is 12.5:1...

http://www.drivingethanol.org/motors...teristics.aspx

Stoich for methanol is 6.4:1... which equals .78 lambda...

I think it was mentioned earlier best power for meth is .69 lambda? Maybe it's like best power for gasoline is 12.5:1 but we never go that lean generally in our tunes. So if we assumed you drop a half point AFR from best power for meth....

4.5:1 AFR meth = .70

That lines up with the .69 mentioned earlier better.

Anyway nothing new here

This was an interesting link though on some guys who seem to tune some serious cars using methanol.

http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.c...=174777&page=1
Old Jan 17, 2008, 08:23 PM
  #89  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
cfdfireman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Consider this also, in my area there is no such thing as pure gasoline it's all 10% to 15% ethanol form the pump.
Old Feb 9, 2008, 12:58 PM
  #90  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
bnice01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hurlburt Field, FL
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well after a month of field testing this theory, came up short and didnt happen the way I planned. I been thru 3 sets of spark plugs, gallons of meth & phatoem knock (I do a pull it would be 0 the next one it would be 8, 7, 6 8 etc). Granted according to DLL I made some power and felt faster. I lower the timing in certain cells, leaned it out to 12.3-11.9, and it feels faster. Plugs dont blow or foul easily not to mention no matter how I get it on it doesnt knock. I look it this way by pulling out more gas, there is more meth in the cylinder. And which one has the better octane rating

I fouled out a set of plugs so bad while driving back from AL I had to find a exit with a auto parts store. because the car buck/sputter so bad going above 60mph.

DLL is saying I am making about the same power, but I dont beleive it. A qoute from my wife "Damn baby this car is a beast what did you do". She thought I bought another car part without telling here LOL.

But this is the way I learn best is by experience trial and error. Field testing FTW


Quick Reply: air fuel ratios and meth



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:31 AM.