San Diego Evo's
Aug 22, 2008, 10:57 AM
#3992
Lol....@ 456whp I started to encounter ignition issues with the OEM ignition....my pulls were only good to about 6k rpms...I got back on the dyno after addressing the issue by lowering the gap on the plugs down to .016 (temp band aid fix) and I am able to rev to 8k with no problem now....
Lets see 
I haven't been to the Q in a while, my driving skills might be a little rusty....
My last successful session at qualcomm netted me a 7.431 @ 94.73 mph with the FP Green on MS 109 making 452whp and 442 ft lbs....
I am just going out tonight to regain the best 91 oct numbers at the Q from someone's 7.887 @ 90mph
I haven't been to the Q in a while, my driving skills might be a little rusty....My last successful session at qualcomm netted me a 7.431 @ 94.73 mph with the FP Green on MS 109 making 452whp and 442 ft lbs....
I am just going out tonight to regain the best 91 oct numbers at the Q from someone's 7.887 @ 90mph
Aug 22, 2008, 11:01 AM
#3993
Evolved Member
iTrader: (52)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stock appearing turbo on pump gas
Stock appearing turbo on alternative fuel
Non-stock appearing on pump gas
Non-stock appearing on alternative fuel
That's pretty much how BR did the DSM shoot-out.
Aug 22, 2008, 11:07 AM
#3994
Here is my FP Green on MS 109 vs my 35R on 91 oct Dyno Chart....
The FP Green was in 3rd gear and the 35R was in 4th gear (We standardized 4th gear pulls after I had tuned my car on the dyno with the FP Green...) which explains why the FP Green pull is smoother looking than the 35R pull...
The reason I am posting this chart is so that you can see how hard it will be to beat my old FP Green MS 109 times @ the Q....
I will change the categories once the need for it comes....I dont want to be the onlt one in the "Non-stock appearing on pump gas" class
The FP Green was in 3rd gear and the 35R was in 4th gear (We standardized 4th gear pulls after I had tuned my car on the dyno with the FP Green...) which explains why the FP Green pull is smoother looking than the 35R pull...
The reason I am posting this chart is so that you can see how hard it will be to beat my old FP Green MS 109 times @ the Q....
If you don't beat that time then you need to be flogged. We need to change the categories:
Stock appearing turbo on pump gas
Stock appearing turbo on alternative fuel
Non-stock appearing on pump gas
Non-stock appearing on alternative fuel
That's pretty much how BR did the DSM shoot-out.
Stock appearing turbo on pump gas
Stock appearing turbo on alternative fuel
Non-stock appearing on pump gas
Non-stock appearing on alternative fuel
That's pretty much how BR did the DSM shoot-out.
I will change the categories once the need for it comes....I dont want to be the onlt one in the "Non-stock appearing on pump gas" class
Aug 22, 2008, 12:13 PM
#3995
Evolved Member
iTrader: (52)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here is my FP Green on MS 109 vs my 35R on 91 oct Dyno Chart....
The FP Green was in 3rd gear and the 35R was in 4th gear (We standardized 4th gear pulls after I had tuned my car on the dyno with the FP Green...) which explains why the FP Green pull is smoother looking than the 35R pull...
The reason I am posting this chart is so that you can see how hard it will be to beat my old FP Green MS 109 times @ the Q....
I will change the categories once the need for it comes....I dont want to be the onlt one in the "Non-stock appearing on pump gas" class
The FP Green was in 3rd gear and the 35R was in 4th gear (We standardized 4th gear pulls after I had tuned my car on the dyno with the FP Green...) which explains why the FP Green pull is smoother looking than the 35R pull...
The reason I am posting this chart is so that you can see how hard it will be to beat my old FP Green MS 109 times @ the Q....
I will change the categories once the need for it comes....I dont want to be the onlt one in the "Non-stock appearing on pump gas" class
Aug 22, 2008, 12:28 PM
#3996
Evolved Member
iTrader: (52)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I ran 7.8s with the following power:
With some better driving I should have ran 7.6-7.7s. Now that the power looks like this:
I shouldn't have any problem running 7.1-7.2s at the Q with good driving. I am making 12-13psi at launch now. Of course this is all talk. Need to back it up at the track!
With some better driving I should have ran 7.6-7.7s. Now that the power looks like this:
I shouldn't have any problem running 7.1-7.2s at the Q with good driving. I am making 12-13psi at launch now. Of course this is all talk. Need to back it up at the track!
