Works 269 Cams Dyno Numbers?
Feb 14, 2004, 01:27 PM
#63
Evolving Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Stanford, CA
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Option2
jstockdale-
Are those figures corrected figures? What are your uncorrected figures?
jstockdale-
Are those figures corrected figures? What are your uncorrected figures?
I'm pretty sure that WORKS doesn't SAE correct the dyno numbers, since it's pretty arbitrary (read: bull****). The main thing we were looking at was the change between a strong stock car and the modded setup.
SAE correction is usually an attempt to (a) make it possible to compare different dyno's or different conditions (b) sugar coat the results, to get bigger numbers. Neither is very constructive, since SAE correction still won't make the DD and DT and 2wd / 4wd dyno's even come close to agreeing with each other.
-S ...
Jan 27, 2009, 03:52 PM
#65
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With Intake, o2 outlet housing back exhaust, 94oct, SAFC, I made 289whp 265 lbs ft torque. I added Autronic SMC 1.99, lower intercooler tube, Works 269 cams, springs and retainers, 680cc injectors still on 94 oct made 356whp and 336 lbs ft of torque both tunes done on dyno pack 5000. with largest gain of 90 whp and 95 lbs ft torque
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alloutDSM
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum
3
May 4, 2008 09:06 PM
anjapower
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
29
Apr 6, 2005 11:42 AM
